The Sure Cure for Voter Fraud

American Thinker ^ | September 27, 2012 | Bruce Walker

[neverdem]

Conservatives are rightly concerned that the left wins close elections by fraud. The photo identification laws which Republican legislatures have passed are a sensible reform to make the theft of votes harder, but judges whose partisan allegiance and ideological tendencies are transparent invent reasons not to enforce those laws.

The left already buys votes by the tens of millions using our tax dollars to elect toadies who will oppose our economic interests and moral beliefs. The left creates a vast superstructure of taxpayer-funded public schools, libraries, and colleges to brainwash young minds into becoming robots of leftism. The left does not need or want to buy or coerce individual voters; it does not even think of Americans as individuals.

So why does the left still need to steal votes? The left needs voter fraud because at its core, the corrupt, vain, and dumb left is just that weak. What can we do, though, if judges step in and stop laws intended to stop voter fraud from being enforced?

There is one sure cure, which sounds draconian and maybe even weird, but which is simple, clear, fair and pure. We ought to revise our election laws so that Americans vote in elections the way that we used to do when all four presidents on Mount Rushmore were elected president: we ought to restore the public ballot.

The way it should happen is that when we cast a ballot in an election, we do it in the open, with a photo taken and mailing address recorded at the time our vote is cast. The secret ballot was an Australian, not an American, creation, and the rationale was that this way, employers and landlords could not punish those who voted against the interests of the rich. It has not worked, and it no...

[Ann Archy]

Lessadolla????? No WONDER she votes multiple times in OTHER names.....she must HATE hers!

[trebb]

Sowers received a five-year prison term for each of the 10 counts, but Circuit Court Judge Charles Webster permitted Sowers to serve those terms concurrently, according to the Tunica Times, the only media outlet to cover the sentencing. Too bad, he deserved 50 years. Thanks for the link.

Yep - concurrent terms makes it like the majority portion of the crime isn't being punishable. Even though consecutive terms might be a bit overboard for some crimes, they ought to pro-rate multiple instances and add years if they go concurrent.

[neverdem]

She.

I was distracted with another thread that I posted around that time, and its author, C. Edmund Wright, who frequently posts on Free Republic. I remembered that he wrote that he had helped Newt's campaign last spring.

Should Mitt Hire Jay Leno and Pat Caddell?

I noticed a subtitle at the National Review Online's regular webpage, but not on it's printer friendly page, nor at the Washington Examiner:

Barone: Obama's war on young voters who elected him

Obama and the Millennials

He has industrial-age solutions for information-age challenges.

C. Edmund Wright eventually wrote that he was in contact one of Romney's sons, Tagg Romney. I thought a line like that subtitle would be great in a debate or an ad, IMHO.