If 9/11 wasn't bad enough to be a game-changer, then nothing will be. Even after that, Islam was still a religion of peace according to the media and most politicians including Bush. The majority of the public would have been happy to do anything after 9/11 to exterminate the obvious threat, but few elites are willing to do it.
Newt Gingrich is one of the few prominent politicians who talks frankly and clearly about the nature of the Muslim threat. He's also made it fairly clear that we would need to unleash the same kind of brutality we did against our enemies in WW2 to win this war.
I agree with Newt. And if they did this, they’d deserve it and more of the levels of what we did in WWII.
I can't agree. 9/11 could be (and was) taken as "adults attacking adults", with any deaths of youngsters as "collateral damage". A deliberate direct attack on American children will have the same effect that Pearl Harbor did in 1941, only much more so. No mosque or practicing Muslim will be safe, and the retribution abroad will be swift and terrible.
Are Americans capable of such......hell, yes......see the actions taken during the Civil War.
Not sure about brutality.
Burying or otherwise contacting them with pig offal or other piggy stuff seemed to work for the Brits and it’s rumored that the Isralies put a stop to those guys blowing up themselves on busses simply by putting packages of lard on the busses.
Sure beats strip-searches!
One of my sons works for a large hog operation so there’s access to plenty of ammunition for burial, transfusions or whatever creative ways can be devised and televised to send them to hell forever.