We have all kinds of laws in Texas that would get you put in jail in MA.
The States will make the decision.
I hope they choose wisely, but that’s the way the founders set up the Federal Gov.
We are supposed to look at Ca an say, Dude... that’s ****ed up, and vote it down as a nation.
Within those states I think Local law should have the most sway and beyond that I believe in individual property rights.
Isn’t that what the founders had in mind? Isn’t that America?
“We have all kinds of laws in Texas that would get you put in jail in MA.
The States will make the decision.
I hope they choose wisely, but that’s the way the founders set up the Federal Gov.
We are supposed to look at Ca an say, Dude... that’s ****ed up, and vote it down as a nation.
Within those states I think Local law should have the most sway and beyond that I believe in individual property rights.
Isn’t that what the founders had in mind? Isn’t that America?”
Section 4.
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
Seems to me a greater argument could be made to stop States like Massachusetts screwing their own electorate with anti-Republican laws that don’t even have a basis within their own constitutions.
mylife you may be shocked to learn that States also have Constitutions, RomneyCare was unconstitutional under the State Constitution. You pimp everyone of these threads and all you do is make matters worse.