[wiggen]

You can dance around all you want but the fact is there is a quarter of the population jobless and of that a percentage with no income. Thats the fact. Its out there. It’s not debatable. There will always be more of that anonymous woman out there and eventually no husbands with jobs. You can pretend your suggestion was only about her while ignoring the tens of thousands of other women in the same boat across Spain but that will not change the fact that you consider women second class citizens.

[PapaBear3625]

You can dance around all you want but the fact is there is a quarter of the population jobless and of that a percentage with no income. Thats the fact. Its out there. It’s not debatable.

I accept that. I submitted a solution that is likely to work for at least some of the women.

Here are the only choices:

(1) Get a job. If not an "official" job, then find somebody you can do something for in exchange for food and shelter.

(2) Depend on charity. Either family members willing to help out, private charity, or welfare. But the money appears to have run out for that.

(3) Die.

There is also (4): join a gang of looters and take what you can from those that have it. Trying that in my neighborhood will functionally be equivalent to (3). if not immediately, then eventually.

[RegulatorCountry]

The fact of the matter is, it's a means of survival, whether or not it offends your ever so exquisitely attuned notions of gender equity. It's also potentially unacceptable from a moral standpoint, but I note you veer immediately into Gloria Steinem territory, rather than conservative, religious based morality.

None of the above changes the fact, yes, fact, that seeking a patron to support you when you have no means of supporting yourself actually is a means of survival.

Next comes the “it's so unfair, not every woman can do that” tripe, again right out of Marxism 101, no doubt.

Why are you here, to keep us from scraping our knuckles on the ground?