[kabar]

It came from Rodguy's post #14: Factor in that Stevens was asked several days before the 911 hit by locals if he wanted additional security at the embassy. He said no.

I was addressing that comment.

[Just mythoughts]

It came from Rodguy's post #14: Factor in that Stevens was asked several days before the 911 hit by locals if he wanted additional security at the embassy. He said no. I was addressing that comment.

Thank you. I missed that in #14. I have read just about everything the world media has put out and I have yet to read 'official' claims that Stevens turned down additional security. He may well have, but, this administration from the get-go blame that '14 minute video'. To date none of the top three, Obama, Clinton, or Rice have been able to admit this was a terrorist hit, and they were warned days before by the Libyan president. I sure would like to know exactly who the Libyan president gave those warnings.

I cannot see any person no matter their politics making themselves a sitting duck. And as it turns out that is exactly what Stevens was. Why would he deliberately make himself an unprotected target? Until I hear/read a better explanation, I think there was an orchestrated plot by our administration using that '14 minute video', to give plausible excuse for returning Gitmo detainees, and that blind man.