Posted on 09/23/2012 4:56:25 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
September 23rd, 2012
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Robert “Baghdad Bob” Gibbs, adviser to Obama’s campaign, who left the White House as Obama’s first press secretary, due to even the DNC media having a hard time with his lies, will gleefully lie to part-time White House spokesman Chris Wallace; Gov. Scott Walker, R-Wis., survivor of democrat lies, smears and a Obama/union failed recall attempt costing the Wisconsin taxpayers millions, who, like Romney today, had the DNC media saying was behind in the race, only to win easily because the DNC media kept showing fraudulent polls.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Gov. Deval Patrick D-Mass. , whose name is remarkedly like the name of evil: The DEVIL, and is a race baiting hustler and economic failure like Obama; Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H. , who was also “behind” in the polls in 2010, as reported by the DNC media, and easily cruised to victory (60% to 36% final!), and who this morning will be constantly interrupted and argued with by White House Chief PMSNBC leaning forward, San Francisco-style, Spokesman Dave “sometimes confused on this thread as Dick” Gregory.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Former Impeached and accused Rapist President Bill Clinton, who was disbarred from the Bar Association for LIFE for LYING, will tell more whoppers while being interviewed by White House Spokesman Bob “Purple-faced Rage” Schieffer, who ironically got his nickname by LYING to the public about Bill Clinton.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Mocked and ridiculed Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus, whose name is often mispronounced on purpose by bitter DNC media White House spokesmen in an attempt to discredit whatever points Mr. Priebus is trying to make; David Axelrod, adviser to President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign, known liar, confident of Chicago mobsters and all-around dear friend of all the DNC media, whose interview will be a classic juxtapose of Mr. Piebus’s, who will be treated rudely, talked over, and not allowed to finish, while Mr Assholerod will pontificate and lie with grateful smiles and a nods from whatever White House spokesman interviews him.
STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Sens. the Dick Durbin, D-Ill. , who had called our troops Nazis, Gestapo, and KGB, will be allowed to caterwauler and lie about the Republicans while the White House spokesperson “Way To Much” Candy Crowley proudly beams, and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. , Gay Republican and RINO and John McCain bedfellow who appears on these shows WAY too often but is always invited back to stick a knife into the back of his Party’s principles and either knows this and DOES NOT care, or is the stupidest, vainest alternative lifestyler Republican in office; Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., whom White House-sized spokesperson Candy will ask repeatedly when that loser Romney will resign so that Obama can get on with destroying the country.
No, of course not...you are right.
We will probably find out what we do, from the foreign press, as we have in the past.
Absolutely spot on!
Remember all of the recrimination over 9/11; what did the president know and when did he know it?
Such was the statement made THEN by our current Secretary of State—now part of this very cover up!
They are running Bill Clinton's ad here in New Jersey constantly....
Yeah. Hey! They might shoot somebody and that would be bad for 0bama’s reelection or Hillary’s reputation.
I tend to call it desperation when they run Obammy ads NON STOP in Minnesota...home of Al Franken, Jesse Ventura and the mentally deranged governor Dayton......I mean seriously...Obammy is spoending millions on one of THE states that loves this POS?
I am also inundated with ads on virtually every channel telling me how wonderful queer marriage is, and I need to vote FOR it in Minnespta...(yeah, when pigs fly!!)
Canada is beginning to look better and better to me!!!!!!!!!
We are not a nation of immigrants--85% of us were born here. And what exactly does it mean to be a nation of immigrants? Most of the countries in this world can claim the same thing.
Are We Really a Nation of Immigrants? Good read. Here are some excerpts:
"To say that America is a "nation of immigrants" is to imply that there has never been an actual American people apart from immigration. It is to put America out of existence as a historically existing nation that immigrants and their children joined by coming here, a country with its own right to exist and to determine its own sovereign destiny—a right that includes the right to permit immigration or not. No patriot, no decent person who loves this country, as distinct from loving some whacked-out, anti-national, leftist idea of this country, would call it a "nation of immigrants." Any elected official who utters the subversive canard that America is a "nation of immigrants" should, at the least, find his phone lines tied up with calls from irate constituents.
Of course, at first glance it seems indisputable that "we are a nation of immigrants," in the sense that all Americans, even including the American Indians, are either immigrants themselves or descendants of people who came here from other places. Given those facts, it would have been more accurate to say that we are "a nation of descendants of immigrants." But such a mundane assertion would fail to convey the thrilling idea conjured up by the phrase "nation of immigrants"—the idea that all of us, whether or not we are literally immigrants, are somehow "spiritually" immigrants, in the sense that the immigrant experience defines our character as Americans.
This friendly-sounding, inclusive sentiment—like so many others of its kind—turns out to be profoundly exclusive. For one thing, it implies that anyone who is not an immigrant, or who does not identify with immigration as a key aspect of his own being, is not a "real" American. It also suggests that newly arrived immigrants are more American than people whose ancestors have been here for generations. The public television essayist Richard Rodriguez spelled out these assumptions back in the 1990s when he declared, in his enervated, ominous tone: "Those of us who live in this country are not the point of America. The newcomers are the point of America." Certainly the illegal-alien demonstrators in Los Angeles last week agreed with him; America, they kept telling us, belongs to them, not to us.
In reality, we are not—even in a figurative sense—a nation of immigrants or even a nation of descendants of immigrants. As Chilton Williamson pointed out in The Immigration Mystique, the 80,000 mostly English and Scots-Irish settlers of colonial times, the ancestors of America’s historic Anglo-Saxon majority, had not transplanted themselves from one nation to another (which is what defines immigration), but from Britain and its territories to British colonies. They were not immigrants, but colonists. The immigrants of the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries came to an American nation that had already been formed by those colonists and their descendants. Therefore to call America "a nation of immigrants" is to suggest that America, prior to the late nineteenth century wave of European immigration, was not America. It is to imply that George Washington and Ulysses S. Grant (descended from the original colonists) were not "real" Americans, but that Richard Rodriguez (descended from 20th century immigrants) and the anti-American demonstrators last week in Los Angeles, are.
Apart from its politically correct function of diminishing the Anglo-Saxon Americans of the pre-Ellis Island period and their descendants, the "nation of immigrants" motto is meaningless in practical terms. Except for open-borders utopians (a group that has grown over the years until now it seems to constitute a majority of the Democratic Party), everyone knows that we must have some limits on immigration. The statement, "we are a nation of immigrants," gives us no guidance on what those limits should be. Two hundred thousand immigrants per year? Two million? Why not twenty million—since we’re a nation of immigrants? The slogan also doesn’t tell us, once we have decided on overall numbers, what the criterion of selection shall be among the people who want to come here. Do we choose on the basis of family ties to recent immigrants? Language? Income? Nationality? Race? Victim status? First come first served? Willingness to work for a lower wage than Americans work for? The "nation of immigrants" slogan cannot help us choose among these criteria because it doesn’t state any good that is to be achieved by immigration. It simply produces a blind emotional bias in favor of more immigration rather than less, making rational discussion of the issue impossible."
Baraq Obama and Bill Clinton: ‘The buck never got here.”
I suspect the Ambassador was suppose to be kidnapped and traded for the Blind terrorist we hold not killed
If you’re not on it, Publius has a ping list for Ayn Rand. You can get to his account at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2934979/posts?page=18#18
Also, he hosted an entire group that read, or reread, Atlas Shrugged weekly and posted comments and analysis comparing AS to today’s world situation. He can tell you that link as well if you want it.
Bay Buchanan did an excellent job—the ONLY one on that panel that did.
Funny thing—the same phony “conservative” ‘holes that are ragging on Romney for telling the truth... aren’t they the same ones that told us Romney is the only one who can win???
It’s getting harder to deny the “conspiracy” that there’s only one party IF we’re talking about the Establishment. TEA Party is another whole thing and I hope we can prevail.
Not according to the Professional polling Candy
Suppose Obama was a Republican.
You know what the spin would be from Candy and the rest of the Leftist media machine?
“Obama is in serious trouble. No incumbent President polling less then 50% has ever won reelection. That the Dem is polling neck and neck with Obama is a sign the election is all but over for Obama.”
If it is all in the bag for O why is Obama having to go to reliably blue state WI to campaign?
Precisely!!!!
Exactly that’s why we are here. We have to dig out everything. We want to know,wouldn’t have it any other way.
I don’t call his pathetic show Morning Joe and his Morning Ho’ for nothing.
LOL if Canada only had a coral reef I’d be right there with ya.Only seen snow once.
Great stuff! People forget history real quick and the left creates their own history.
Tell ya the truth John I learn more about this fiasco every day and plan to keep on until it all makes sense.
Great post Sal a lot of truth there.
Good pre-game analysis.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.