[jjotto]

And there’s no hint that Romney finds this kind of funding the least bit objectionable.

[GeronL]

true

[publius911]

And there’s no hint that Romney finds this kind of funding the least bit objectionable.

We had tons of hints about hope and change, and they weren't worth crap.

What you think Romney may or may not do doesn't mean any more than that to me.
I prefer to see what he does.

"It's easy to make promises you can't keep."
Hussein Obama, 2011

[JediJones]

It would be very unlikely Romney would veto the stopping of that funding if the Congress sent it to him. It would be very unlikely Obama would NOT veto it. It’s doubtful Romney will lead on conservative “pet issues,” but if we can get the Congress to lead on them, he’ll almost certainly follow, unlike Obama.

[Tamzee]

And there’s no hint that Romney finds this kind of funding the least bit objectionable.

You're dead wrong. Romney flatly stated months ago he would cut the funding. Perhaps you should take your own tagline's advice and look stuff up?

--------

"Friendly questions from five participants ranged from how he'd rein in medical costs (jettison Obamacare and sell health care like shoes and food and other consumer products) to where he'd cut government spending (his list includes the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides some funding to NPR.)"

http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2012/05/18/153016190/romney-phones-his-campaign-message-into-swing-states

.