1 posted on
09/22/2012 11:39:46 AM PDT by
neverdem
To: neverdem
2 posted on
09/22/2012 11:43:02 AM PDT by
Stayfree
(Find out how Obama is destroying America at White House Commie.com!!)
To: neverdem
As the media ignores without them it would be Romney 70 Obozo 30.
3 posted on
09/22/2012 11:44:31 AM PDT by
boomop1
(term limits will only save this country.)
To: neverdem
Don’t look now, but Romney is overcoming business as usual from the left, and he is just getting started. The debates are on the way, and while Obama will no doubt prove the most hackneyed whiner of maudlin verbosity, he will sink to an effeminate lump before the manliness of Romney’s superior intellect.
4 posted on
09/22/2012 11:49:26 AM PDT by
pallis
To: neverdem; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3; NFHale; Impy; ...
RE :”
The trouble with Romneyand for Romneyis that he has etched an unappealing sketch of himself. For independent voters, he made too many flip-flops in policy to appease the right. Indeed, he had an uncanny knack for offering an easy target for his opposition: “I like being able to fire people,” “I'm also unemployed,” “I'm not concerned about the very poor,” and “Ann drives a couple of Cadillacs.” He seems to be living in another world, referring to middle income as being in the range of “$200,000 to $250,000,” when the median income is more like $50,000. By the way, after four years of Obama’s economic stewardship, that figure represents a dramatic decline of 10 percent and, in fact, is a strong point to Romney's case against the administration.
Such careless remarks have made it easy for the Obama campaign to get away with a program that pits “the millionaires and billionaires” against the people.
........
Instead of making this part of his own case, Romney has exposed himself to the charge that he is out of touch, out of sympathy, and clueless about the lives of the mass of Americans.”
Romney is exactly the WRONG person to argue for accomplishment over dependence. He always has been. I NEVER saw how he could win this debate and he has been proving my point by shooting his own side with stupid comments.
Grover Norquist's claim that Rs can put up an empty suit who only needs to be able to veto or sign bills was not thought out.
8 posted on
09/22/2012 12:11:56 PM PDT by
sickoflibs
(Romney is still a liberal. Just watch him. (Obama-ney Care ))
To: neverdem
Think Romney can use the ole’ “My Number One Priority” shtick?
9 posted on
09/22/2012 12:15:25 PM PDT by
annieokie
(O)
To: neverdem
US News and
world report? Are you kidding?
To: neverdem
Mort Zuckerman decided to be a Democrat because all his friends were. I wouldn’t believe a word he says.
To: neverdem
Obama has even scratched the surface for what’s planned for Myrh Romney ....from the MORMON Planet Kolob in the Constellation Cancer
17 posted on
09/22/2012 12:49:09 PM PDT by
Patton@Bastogne
(Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin will DEFEAT the Obama-Romney Socialist Gay-Marriage Axis of Evil)
To: neverdem
[He seems to be living in another world, referring to middle income as being in the range of “$200,000 to $250,000,” when the median income is more like $50,000.]
Zuckerman just can’t help himself from spreading lies I guess. Romney never said that. He said middle class is “less than 200,000 to 250,000.”
18 posted on
09/22/2012 12:53:36 PM PDT by
KansasGirl
("If you have a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."--B. Hussein Obama)
To: neverdem
I might actually buy a copy of the New York Daily News when they come out and endorse Romney. It might tick off some of their readers, but they’ll get some support.
19 posted on
09/22/2012 1:23:18 PM PDT by
Tanniker Smith
(Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson