Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

No change from yesterday. 7 day sample.
1 posted on 09/21/2012 10:23:20 AM PDT by Arthurio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Arthurio

No disrespect to you, but why bother with a poll of “registered” voters?....this close to the election..only polls of “likely” voters are worth anything..


2 posted on 09/21/2012 10:26:12 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthurio

I was sure Romney would lose a point today, as a reaction to the “47%” video. Consider me pleasantly suprised.


3 posted on 09/21/2012 10:26:39 AM PDT by TonyInOhio (No representation without respiration!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthurio

Romney will win by 5% points nationwide. Obama is a disaster and is gaining NO new voters. He is bleeding voters.

How any journalist or commentator can still say with a straight face that Obama is “running away” with the election is beyond me. Liberalism is a mental disorder.


7 posted on 09/21/2012 10:37:55 AM PDT by TJ Jackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthurio
"No change from yesterday. 7 day sample. "

When the inconsequential 47% tape garners 80% of the air time of CNN and the others, I'm surprised Romney's doing as well as he is.

8 posted on 09/21/2012 10:38:03 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthurio

Whew. This is good news.


10 posted on 09/21/2012 10:39:57 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthurio

I would note that over the past nine Presidential elections, incumbents have garnered almost exactly the same percentage of the popular vote as they have in the mid-September Gallup poll. Should that trend continue, Obama would earn a bit less than 48%.


16 posted on 09/21/2012 10:52:44 AM PDT by TonyInOhio (No representation without respiration!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthurio

It’s getting close to election time, so the polls are gradually shifting over to the real honest, sampling techniques to preserve their credibility so that they will be hired in the next election cycle.

It’s standard practice - use polling to advance their candidate and demoralize opponents early on, then gradually shift over to actual polling in the last week or too to reflect the actual vote that will occur.

Examples are plentiful - the failure to predict the 1980 Reagan win, the 1994 Republican Congress takeover, and the 2010 Republican Tea Party resurgence. Every poll was reflecting a “too-close-to-call” outlook, and yet the elections became landslides.

Their defense is always “the undecideds broke at the last moment”. Nonsense! Does anyone really think that there were all these undecided voters up to the last hours before the election? Do you know anyone who went into the last week of the election saying “I don’t know who I’m voting for”?

From now to election day, the big polls like Gallup will all be saying it’s neck and neck. I don’t know who will win, but I will guarantee you that it will not be a close election. More like 52-48.


19 posted on 09/21/2012 10:55:27 AM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthurio

So, when you adjust for what “Likely voters” would be, the race is more realistically 49%-47% or 49%-46% for Romney.


22 posted on 09/21/2012 11:04:28 AM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (You can wish in one hand and spit in the other and see which gets filled first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Arthurio

Even though this is 7 days wouldn’t Romeny’s 47% video start to show by now


24 posted on 09/21/2012 11:49:04 AM PDT by zt1053
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson