Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ILS21R

Wrong again. It was a federal judge, and wrote in her order that Jones’ constitutional rights were violated.

http://dawudwalid.wordpress.com/2012/04/05/judge-clears-way-for-jones-protest-outside-dearborn-mosque/

April 5, 2012 at 4:37 pm
Judge clears way for Jones protest outside Dearborn mosque

By Oralandar Brand-Williams
The Detroit News

Detroit — Controversial Florida pastor Terry Jones has been given the final green light to go ahead with a protest Saturday outside a Dearborn mosque.

U.S. District Judge Denise Page Hood granted a motion for an emergency temporary restraining order against Dearborn, barring the city from requiring that Jones signs a “hold harmless” agreement before approving his permit to protest in front of the Islamic Center of America.

“This is clearly an unconstitutional clause which impedes plaintiffs’ First Amendment right to free speech and assembly,” said Hood in the order. “The ordinance requiring the indemnity agreement and the “Hold Harmless” presented to Plaintiffs are unconditional and violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution as to Plaintiff and others who wish to exercise their rights to speak and assemble in the public fora.”


120 posted on 09/21/2012 11:14:29 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: abb
You're changing the narrative to the "hold harmless agreement".

Here:

Wayne County Circuit Court Judge Robert Ziolkowski vacated the “breach of peace” ruling against anti-Islam activists Terry Jones and Wayne Sapp on the grounds that they were denied due process.

On appeal, Ziolkowski reversed that ruling. He said the jury should have been instructed to make their verdict based on a “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard instead of the lower preponderance criteria.

Ziolkowski also threw out the order barring Jones and Sapp from visiting the mosque. While the judge said Dearborn’s desire to prevent any gathering, without regards to its content, at that location on that day was reasonable, he said banning the men for going to that site for a period of three years was “overly broad and restrictive.”

But Ziolkowski also ruled the breach of peace ordinance is constitutional, based on long established “time and place” speech restrictions. He also said the ordinance was properly applied in this case.

http://www.mlive.com/news/detroit/index.ssf/2011/11/judge_vacates_breach_of_peace.html

132 posted on 09/21/2012 1:27:27 PM PDT by ILS21R (The time is nigh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson