seriously, when the avg citizen that busts his a$$ for a paycheck, makes a decent living and yet still qualifies for a gimme, why should he not take it, when its going to be given to a welfare queen or illegal anyway ???
this citizen IS nickeled and dimed to death with taxes and fees and regs at every level of gubmint, in every product and service he uses and gets no relief thru the ballot box...just an every prohibitive state, and yet more taxes fees and permission slips to live his life...
we should take every penny we qualify to get, and call it a BLOAT fund...
it was foolish for mittens to speak as though the 47% are insignifigant, and arent 'his' people...when the reality is that even those who are paying the lions share of fed income tax are getting screwed by the same pols that wont cut gubmint with a friggin meataxe...
and these fools are lapping up the R&R gravy of blaming the people that are simply taking whats offered...
welfare queens are a problem...the welfare industrial complex is THE problem...
I don;t see the point of getting into a general discussion NOW on the moral pros and cons of supporting a certain form of welfare just because it was promised for holding a job for some period of time. We can save that one for later,
To me the key point is that R+R are playing both sides and getting caught. Praising then insulting this group of ‘moochers’ to appease two groups at the same time. This is what happens when you believe in nothing. Alternatively Clinton could easily get away with it.
I suppose that's considered heroic as long as you don't then turn around and call other people out on the situation.
The Mittbots just gotta' be besides themselves with confusion and grief over this.
What I need to know is how many Mittbots are also trailer trash and tax evaders? Anyone have an ideas. Then, anyone have any idea how they can possibly vote against their economic interests?