Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton fails to convince Republicans on administration's account of Libya attack
The Hill ^ | September 20, 2012 | Julian Pecquet

Posted on 09/20/2012 4:18:17 PM PDT by jazusamo

Republican lawmakers left a closed-door briefing with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and other officials on Thursday still unconvinced by the administration's assessment that last week's attack that killed four Americans in Libya wasn't a premeditated act of terrorism.

“They're trying to cover their behinds,” Rep. Bill Flores (R-Texas) told The Hill upon leaving the House briefing with Clinton, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and Deputy Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter. Asked if they were successful, he said: “No.”

On the Senate side, things were no different according to Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) “That is the most useless worthless briefing I have attended in a long time,” shortly after the administration officials made their case to the upper chamber.

“I really think they hurt themselves tremendously from the standpoint of trying to build trust," he told reporters. “It, if anything, built far greater distrust in what’s happening than in answering questions. It was pretty unbelievable.”

For his part, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said the information provided to lawmakers on Thursday was nothing new and that lack of information has become a trend with the White House.

"From this administration, I have never gotten information that I have not seen or heard before," McCain said. Including Thursday's Libya briefing, the White House has maintained "a perfect record" in that regard, he added.

Republicans for the past week have been assailing the Obama administration's position the consulate attack was not a coordinated strike, but a protest in reaction to a U.S-made anti-Islam video on YouTube that turned violent. U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice first made the remarks on the Sunday news shows over the weekend, basing her comments on the initial intelligence available.

The administration has since started to call the attack an act of terrorism, but continues to argue it was unplanned. Clinton and the other officials briefed all House and Senate members for the first time Thursday.

“I believe that it's really a stretch — a long stretch — to believe that all of this by coincidence happened on 9/11,” Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.) told The Hill after the briefing. He said his opinion hasn't changed, “even though that's not necessarily what they're telling me.”

But Rep. Buck McKeon (R-Calif.), the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, told reporters it was clear what happened in Benghazi last Tuesday.

It was a “planned, premeditated attack,” he said. “It's pretty obvious [Stevens] did not have adequate security,” he added.

The administration's previous claims the attack was simply a protest gone horribly wrong and current argument the attack was unplanned simply "sets our efforts back" to address al Qaeda's growing influence in Libya, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) added.

But not all Republicans were as willing to chastise the administration's lack of disclosure during Thursday's briefings. Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.), ranking member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said he thought it was a good briefing.

“I would disagree,” Lugar said when asked about complaints from other lawmakers. “I felt it was very comprehensive.”

Senate Intelligence Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) also defended the level of information the administration gave to lawmakers.

“I feel that we received a briefing that was comprehensive,” Feinstein told reporters.

“I don’t believe they were holding back. I think they said what they knew," she added. "They’re very concerned and they want to do this right and put the evidence together and make the case that will stand.”

Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.), who helped write the Embassy Security Act after the 1998 attacks on the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, said he was confident the truth would come out — even if it's after the election. Clinton announced Thursday that retired Ambassador Thomas Pickering has been selected to lead an independent investigation into the Libya attack, which is due to Congress within 60 days.


“We still don't know how long it took them to put this whole attack together, does it comport with a timeline of when the movie came out ... so we're still in the learning stage,” he said. “I always want to trust but verify.”

—Carlo Muñoz and Jeremy Herb contributed.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: clinton; kenyanbornmuzzie; libya; lyingliberals; obama; terrorism; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: jazusamo
`I'm going to miss Democrats in the White House.' Satan, with portfolio
21 posted on 09/20/2012 4:55:05 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
I can't help thinking there's something big, something very, very damaging to Obama that hasn't come out yet about this entire situation. Whatever it is, it's more than just an embarrassing failure of Obama’s Middle East policy. Even as more and more evidence comes out that this was a well planned attack that had been in the works for some time, Obama’s people are still sticking to their basic story that “we don't know all the facts” and that the video is primarily to blame. You would think the revelation that the mastermind behind the Libya attacked was a detainee at Gitmo that was released during the Bush administration would be viewed as a Godsend, giving Obama an opportunity to blame this whole thing on Bush. So far, however, they haven't done anything with that, causing me to think there's something really big, something his friends in the media can't spin, that they are trying to keep quiet.
22 posted on 09/20/2012 4:55:44 PM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josephat

Was hillary wearing an earpiece?


23 posted on 09/20/2012 4:56:37 PM PDT by MestaMachine (obama kills and bo stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia

GREAT GRAPHIC!


24 posted on 09/20/2012 4:58:10 PM PDT by MestaMachine (obama kills and bo stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

25 posted on 09/20/2012 5:02:53 PM PDT by timestax (Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreenHornet
I don't know but I'm honestly not surprised any longer when something outrageous surfaces about Obama and the lengths he and his worshipers will go to to make him look squeaky clean, it really is pathetic.
26 posted on 09/20/2012 5:03:40 PM PDT by jazusamo ("Intellect is not wisdom" -- Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine; mkboyce

Hat tip to FReeper mkboyce


27 posted on 09/20/2012 5:05:04 PM PDT by MissMagnolia (Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GreenHornet
Go to The Blaze.com. Glen Beck puts out a theory that Stevens was CIA. He went to Benghazi to broker a deal to return armaments the US had previously provided the rebels. According to Beck, Stevens was lured to his death, and then killed. Sounds as plausible as anything else since none of these questions have been answered:

1. What was the ambassador doing in Benghazi?

2. On 9/11?

3. He had no advance team and virtually no security. Why not?

4. Who were the x-seals who just happened to be there but were not part of Steven's security? Who were they working for? What were they doing in Benghazi on 9/11?

28 posted on 09/20/2012 5:07:50 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, we'll just grow algae.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: stormhill

Wow, I had forgotten all about that one. Now would be a perfect time for someone in office to use it. The coverup is always worse. I can’t believe even Hillary is that naive, there’s way more than whet they’re admitting, way more. Gross negligence ata minimum.

It’s not to late to file for impeachment but that would require stones that I don’t think the GOP has.


29 posted on 09/20/2012 5:15:53 PM PDT by SueRae (See it? Hell, I can TASTE November from my house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

But not because they’re embarrassed. Perhaps because their ratings went down. Otherwise they’d GLADLY promote Obama’s lies.


30 posted on 09/20/2012 5:16:01 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Yes, He does only thinks of himself and his Marxist agenda.
He's trying to destroy us and the disgusting MSM is helping.

31 posted on 09/20/2012 5:26:33 PM PDT by RedMDer (https://support.woundedwarriorproject.org/default.aspx?tsid=93destr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia

Wow so true


32 posted on 09/20/2012 5:28:11 PM PDT by waxer1 ("The Bible is the rock on which our republic rests." -Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
that's the US response to killing four Americans, one of which was an Ambassador?

Obama and the Hildabeast are going to conduct an internal investigation by a hand picked stooge?

when they kill us now nothing goes boom - it goes to committee

.

33 posted on 09/20/2012 5:31:27 PM PDT by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
I think Hillary choosing Pickering to investigate is her way of blaming Obama without her direct involvement.

Pickering seems to have history with the Clintons. She said she would be gone after one term. A Pickering report absolving Hillary and blaming Obama might be a nice payback for accusing Bubba of racism

34 posted on 09/20/2012 5:38:20 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man (T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Hillary is so Vain
35 posted on 09/20/2012 5:45:01 PM PDT by Repeat Offender (Official Romney/GOP-E Platform - We suck less)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man
I believe that's a valid point. I've always believed there's no love lost between Hillary and Obama and was surprised she accepted the SS job.

Her choosing Pickering could be payback for him whether he wins or loses the election.

36 posted on 09/20/2012 5:48:57 PM PDT by jazusamo ("Intellect is not wisdom" -- Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian
“4. Who were the x-seals who just happened to be there but were not part of Steven's security? Who were they working for? What were they doing in Benghazi on 9/11?”
___________________

According to various press reports one of the SEALs, Glenn “Bub” Doherty, had been interviewed a few months ago by ABC News and indicated he and his team were in Libya to track down and destroy several thousand MANPADS (MAN Portable Air Defense System: Portable surface to air missiles) which had disappeared since the Ghadaffi regieme had fallen. I presume the other former SEAL killed, Tyrone “Rone” Woods, was also part of the team Doherty referred to; although that is not clear.

Link: http://abcnewsradioonline.com/world-news/american-killed-in-libya-was-on-intel-mission-to-track-weapo.html

37 posted on 09/20/2012 5:54:19 PM PDT by Ozymandias Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Ozymandias Ghost

That fits Beck’s hypothesis.


38 posted on 09/20/2012 5:57:41 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, we'll just grow algae.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GreenHornet
There is no way possible you can plan an attack against a particular person, on a particular day, at a particular location weeks or even months in advance without some guarantee that person will be there on that day.

The only people that could guarantee he would be there on that day are Zippo and/or Hillary.

39 posted on 09/20/2012 6:05:46 PM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
“We still don't know how long it took them to put this whole attack together, does it comport with a timeline of when the movie came out ... so we're still in the learning stage,” he said. “I always want to trust but verify.” - Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.), who helped write the Embassy Security Act after the 1998 attacks on the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania,

ME protests: the hardline 'tele-Islamist' who brought anti-Islam film to Muslim world's attention

...but nobody had paid attention to its crude libels against the Prophet Mohammed until Mr Abdullah's show broadcast clips from it last weekend,... - Sept. 8-9

-----------------------------------------------

Egypt intelligence warns (on Sept 4th) of attacks on Israel, US embassies

Congress was warned about Libya last month

Libyan president: 'No doubt' attack 'preplanned' (Magariaf on Face the Nation)

"It was planned, definitely. It was planned by foreigners, by people who entered the country a few months ago. And they were planning this criminal act since their arrival," Magariaf said.

No demonstration before attack on US Consulate, source says

"The intelligence source said no protests were happening before the attackers struck at about 9:35 p.m. local time last Tuesday. The account backs up claims by a purported Libyan security guard who told McClatchy Newspapers late last week that the area was quiet before the attack."

Source: Slain ambassador Stevens said he was on al Qaeda list

Report: Never an Anti-American Protest in Benghazi, Only a Planned Attack (CBS Video Report)


40 posted on 09/20/2012 6:08:04 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson