Must have meant 1960.
Maybe he is refering to 1968 and 1992 where the winner did not receive a majority of the popular vote (but a plurality) but won the election.
Of all the times when the "loser" of the popular vote won the electoral college vote, his leading opponent was under 50% of the popular vote, with the possible exception of 1876, where Tilden may have had over 50% of the popular vote (hard to know with a lot of voter fraud and vote-suppression going on).