Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Perdogg

Must have meant 1960.


20 posted on 09/19/2012 10:12:13 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: SoCal Pubbie

Maybe he is refering to 1968 and 1992 where the winner did not receive a majority of the popular vote (but a plurality) but won the election.


28 posted on 09/19/2012 10:19:12 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: SoCal Pubbie
Nixon may have had a popular vote plurality in 1960. They count all the Democrat votes in Alabama as Kennedy votes even though the Democrat electors split--what was on the ballots which the voters saw? It's hard to know what percentage of them wanted Kennedy and what percentage favored Harry F. Byrd.

Of all the times when the "loser" of the popular vote won the electoral college vote, his leading opponent was under 50% of the popular vote, with the possible exception of 1876, where Tilden may have had over 50% of the popular vote (hard to know with a lot of voter fraud and vote-suppression going on).

44 posted on 09/19/2012 12:00:37 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson