Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: paul51
I don't know what your point is

Sure you do but you're unwilling to admit that one person's perception of a threat does not equal yours. And you're also unable to come to grips with the fact that brandishing a weapon in a hostile environment does not mean that it needs to discharged at the threat.

My suggestion to you superman is to reread the article and tell me where the guy was wrong in brandishing his weapon after being threatened with death to both him and his family with a firearm that the potential assailaint claimed he had as well as calling in a homie to help him.

I don't care how much of a badass you think you are or how fast you think you can draw Hickock but 1.5 seconds is likely to get you, or your wife or your child killed if that is the assailant's intent........

Keep in mind that concealed weapons are for those who do not have the highly honed skills which you obviously have..........

46 posted on 09/19/2012 3:10:39 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Hot Tabasco

If your reading comprehension was a little stronger you would see my original comment was to the other fool who said the subject of the article should have started blasting the thug and the guy that drove up. I wouldn’t second guess anyone that made a reasonable decision on how he thought he should defend himself and his family. I also said as much in a follow up post. As for me, chances are I’m not pulling a firearm until I’m going to fire. If you have a problem with that, I couldn’t care less.


48 posted on 09/19/2012 3:17:47 PM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson