Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the_boy_who_got_lost
The requirement known by the law's critics as the "show me your papers" provision has been at the center of a two-year legal battle that culminated in a U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the requirement.

Okay, I do understand that this requirement went to SCOTUS and it was upheld.

Opponents then asked Bolton to block the requirement and argued it would lead to racial profiling of Latinos.

Now, I'm not on board. - A district court has no standing to block a Supreme Court decision. What were they thinking?

11 posted on 09/18/2012 4:02:37 PM PDT by bill1952 (Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bill1952
This is the result of a Remand. The SCOTUS doesn't just rule one way or another: As an appeals court, they decide what the criteria need to be, then send it back to the lower court with the order to consider the arguments a certain way. This is the procedural requirement to enforce the SCOTUS ruling.
12 posted on 09/18/2012 4:32:07 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Obama considers the Third World morally superior to the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson