Surprised he didn't say it depends on what the definition of free speech is. The o regime has been leaning pretty heavy on the "it depends on what the definition is" excuse lately.
To: chessplayer
Beck did a pretty good riff on free speech yesterday.
2 posted on
09/18/2012 8:51:49 AM PDT by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: chessplayer
Franks boiled it down to a Yes or No question and the idiot still couldn’t avoid equivocation and dodging.
3 posted on
09/18/2012 8:52:36 AM PDT by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit; Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.)
To: chessplayer
It has begun. Selective and “progressive” restrictions on the Bill of Rights is necessary if Obama is to complete his agenda.
4 posted on
09/18/2012 8:56:49 AM PDT by
allendale
To: chessplayer
To: chessplayer
Break out another of those Black Panther “kill Whitey” tapes and they’ll be falling all over themselves to defend that free speech.
6 posted on
09/18/2012 9:15:10 AM PDT by
nolongerademocrat
("Before you ask G-d for something, first thank G-d for what you already have." B'rachot 30b)
To: chessplayer
That’s why there’s a 2nd Amendment.
7 posted on
09/18/2012 9:20:49 AM PDT by
DTogo
(High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
To: chessplayer
8 posted on
09/18/2012 9:39:14 AM PDT by
GloriaJane
(Pro Choice = Pro Death - Pro Life = Pro LIFE!)
To: chessplayer
I guess then the DOJ can start prosecuting a chitload of atheist, eh?
Obama must go, this is a bunch of BS.
10 posted on
09/18/2012 11:16:13 AM PDT by
Irenic
(The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
