Replies

If a poster is a genuine troll, it's easy to tell who true disruptors are. Scottjewell was a "newbie" but if he was a "pro-homo troll" he sure was going about it oddly. (That's what you called him in your ping, isn't it?) There's a current poster who posts on homoagenda threads, and I know he's a flaming-troll because of his exaggerated, hysterical invectives. That guy should be gone; not scottjewell. So how about wagglebee, littlejeremiah, DBeers, massmike, scripter and countless others who have posted articles and comments against the pro-homosexualization of society?

Perhaps you should clarify this.

Are you suggesting that those of us who OPPOSE the homosexual agenda should be banned from Free Republic?

On second thought, I have just come to the epiphany that this site does not practice what it preaches. So what's the point? Carry on.

I see that your FR join date is 2004, but your posting history is somewhat sparse. I've got to wonder what anti-FReeper sites you frequent.

This is just silly. We don't have access to what the Mods have when they make a decision to ban a poster. We don't know if that poster is a retread, or if they have made other posts in the past that were removed due to content.

Blaming other posters for a banning is pointless and unfair.

Are you suggesting that those of us who OPPOSE the homosexual agenda should be banned from Free Republic?

Ladies and gentlemen, that comment is prima facie how good Frepers get zotted unfairly! You say you looked at my posting history and saw it was sparse. About 700 posts in 8 years, so, no I was never a prolific poster. But if you had actually read my posts you would have seen that I was a very adamant prolife poster. It's just so...sad, unfortunate and tiresome that one post can be so misread and a genuine conservative can be banned/suspended like that! I've seen it many times on this site, and no posters rise up to defend the unfairly zotted member.

I've got to wonder what anti-FReeper sites you frequent.

That comment is beneath you and uncalled for, but I will address it anyway.

Wagglebee, I respect you and your dedication to prolife profamily causes, I have been on the Moral Absolutes Ping List my entire time on this site. Yet you accuse me of being an anti-freeper, why? Of course, I am familiar with anti-freeper sites, but I have never posted, nor ever been a member of such forums. The only "anti-freeper" site that I would agree with in the slightest is Liberty Post, and the lack of moderation on that site allows for quite a few nutcases to post with great regularity.

The only political newsgroup I have ever posted on was this site. A stalwart site that stands for conservative values, God, Patriotism, pro-life, pro-traditional family rights, the right to self defense, you know, the good things in life... I respect Mr Robinson, the owner of this site, his views and what he has done, and have never, nor would I ever, malign him. The moderators, on the other hand, are inconsistent and need to called out for that. To my knowledge, the only moderator to do their consistently do their job in a judicous manner is the Religion Moderator.

Perhaps I am too idealistic, and it saddens me so to see people jump for joy when a member is zotted unfairly. This site is supposed to be about conservative political topics, be they social, religious, financial or military, or so I believed, and not a collections of cliques that band together to together to attack a perceived outsider because they haven't hit the magic post count/years of membership. Anyway, I made my case the The Old Lady and not the Moderator because I am just a peon on this site of no import.

Thank you for you understanding.

Are you suggesting that those of us who OPPOSE the homosexual agenda should be banned from Free Republic?

Ladies and gentlemen, that comment is prima facie how good Frepers get zotted unfairly! You say you looked at my posting history and saw it was sparse. About 700 posts in 8 years, so, no I was never a prolific poster. But if you had actually read my posts you would have seen that I was a very adamant prolife poster. It's just so...sad, unfortunate and tiresome that one post can be so misread and a genuine conservative can be banned/suspended like that! I've seen it many times on this site, and no posters rise up to defend the unfairly zotted member.

I've got to wonder what anti-FReeper sites you frequent.

That comment is beneath you and uncalled for, but I will address it anyway.

Wagglebee, I respect you and your dedication to prolife profamily causes, I have been on the Moral Absolutes Ping List my entire time on this site. Yet you accuse me of being an anti-freeper, why? Of course, I am familiar with anti-freeper sites, but I have never posted, nor ever been a member of such forums. The only "anti-freeper" site that I would agree with in the slightest is Liberty Post, and the lack of moderation on that site allows for quite a few nutcases to post with great regularity.

The only political newsgroup I have ever posted on was this site. A stalwart site that stands for conservative values, God, Patriotism, pro-life, pro-traditional family rights, the right to self defense, you know, the good things in life... I respect Mr Robinson, the owner of this site, his views and what he has done, and have never, nor would I ever, malign him. The moderators, on the other hand, are inconsistent and need to called out for that. To my knowledge, the only moderator to do their consistently do their job in a judicous manner is the Religion Moderator.

Perhaps I am too idealistic, and it saddens me so to see people jump for joy when a member is zotted unfairly. This site is supposed to be about conservative political topics, be they social, religious, financial or military, or so I believed, and not a collections of cliques that band together to together to attack a perceived outsider because they haven't hit the magic post count/years of membership. Anyway, I made my case the The Old Lady and not the Moderator because I am just a peon on this site of no import.

Thank you for you understanding.

Waggs I could be totally wrong here but I don’t believe scottjewell is a pro homo troll. Yes he is a newbie but I say give him time and let’s get a “feel” (no pun intended) for him.