“He wanted that human contact, he wanted to be able to speak to Palestinians on the street, and he couldn’t because security regulations made him always travel in armored vehicles,” she said. “He used to talk about how he felt this was an obstacle to his ability to really be who he wanted to be.”
At the same time, she said, “those security measures might have saved his life in a very different context.” Now there creeps in a thought, she said, that perhaps he was too trusting.
There have been some posts claiming that he was gay, and that he was raped by the crowd because they knew it. If he had a desire to participate in a gay lifestyle with locals, it would explain both why he would shun security that would limit his opportunities, and why they would know he was gay. The Obama administration will have plenty of blame for this, and the reason for the attack itself was not Steven's sexuality, but Stevens may have taken extra risks upon himself, and finally paid the price.
Possibly, but the real story is Obama is an incompetent “leader” and Hillary both care more about muslim feelings than they do about the lives of dedicated Americans.
I heard tonight that more than 50 of our soldiers have been killed in Afghanistan this year by Afghans who they were supposedly training. And the 5 Harrier jets had to be worth a lot of money. Obama doesn’t want to win in Afghanistan and I doubt he will never bring our guys home, in spite of his “timetable for withdrawal”. Hopefully Romney will bring them home. We can’t win a war when we turn over our weapons to the enemy.
HillBuzz, a gay conservative website says it was well known, in the State Dept. that Stevens was gay.
Is it possible that Stevens was lured to Benghazi by a lover?
Why would Stevens risk going there on 9-11? What is one of the worlds oldest motivators? Just a thought.