Don’t have to make a court case out of every incident.
Was an honest mistake, not malicious.
Pay the lady two hundred dollars and problem solved.
Wallmart can mail torn pieces to govt to get $200 back.
Walmart. Avoid the place routinely. Seem to hire in a “social experiment” mode.
No. Idiocracy.
Genuine. Destroying currency. crime.
Fake. Destroying evidence. Also a crime.
DA should offer a deal where the employee pleads to the crime carring the lesser sentence, and serves the maximum.
Don’t have to make a court case out of every incident.
Was an honest mistake, not malicious.
Pay the lady two hundred dollars and problem solved.
Wallmart can mail torn pieces to govt to get $200 back.
Actually, you are totally correct....WalMart can replace those torn 100 bills...so giving the customer back two non-torn 100 bills would not be a problem....
However, WalMart is not the brightest of companies...and their lower management probably is clueless about that. Heck, all WalMart work schedules are done at their corporate offices...not at their local stores
>> Don’t have to make a court case out of every incident.
It seems many self-described Conservatives are into the victimhood and litigation thing.
“Was an honest mistake, not malicious.”
Their actions were indeed malicious. Even if their ignorant understanding of fake bills were put aside, their treatment of this women was malicious.
Did you miss the part where the lady was unlawfully detained for two hours?