Unfortunately, there's no “we” in this equation with Jarret/Soros and the telepromter reading, pecker puffing, son of a communist bitch & muslim goat herder at the helm.
There's no way Israel(alone) has the assets to neutralize Iran by conventional means. Not to mention the consequences if they try.......How many neo Jihad-Jerk nations and their allies will descend upon Israel?
Israel will have no choice but to go nuclear if the many nations of Islam roll towards Her (I wouldn't count Egypt out). What happens if Russia gets involved?
A farkin mess brought to you buy idiot American voters and a criminal U.S. “press” corpse
you have to thank Obama for adding to this....
I see the issue from a different perspective.
Why doesn’t someone just say he plays for the other side?
Or better yet, he already knows exactly what is in the tube?
This arab spring thing is just one of Obama’s orchestrated, choreographed and conducted projects in building and consolidating his North African caliphate. Being muslim, he knows exactly what he is doing, and at America’s expense. As a result , we have a Ghazi operating in our White House.
Too many people are blind to this.
Strategically, his goal was to encapsulate Israel. Soon they will take a run at it and if they find it easy going, then they will take another run at America.
Worst part? Obama has a penchant for dictators and “rulers” and the alien/muslim feels the same should be for America. It will be a bitch prying his ass from the White House. I believe he will attempt to hang on to power at any cost.
Obama’s strategy is not pro American, rather the exact opposite/
A weak America strips the world of stability, leadership, prosperity and success for all. Instability will inject endless war, poverty and suffering.
I presume Israel has stockpiles of weapons-grade nuclear material and of the devices, such that it can load the devices and get them into the air on short notice.
Should Israel be attacked with a nuclear weapon, the restraints of the Nuclear Non-proliferation treaty are bye bye (this is right in the treaty). This would mean Israel or any ally of Israel could, without authorization of the UN Security Council, retaliate with nuclear weapons (and/or in any other way it deems fit).
I doubt Obama would join in a retaliation. He’d hem and haw and try to find some way to nuance the thing.
I really don’t know what Romney would do. But, there’s a chance he’d be more decisive.
The real advantage of the U.S. joining in is that we have such an enormous stockpile of nuclear weapons, as well as other weapons, that we could make sure the war over very quickly and in a way that would dissuade others from joining in.
In other words, after 10,000 years or so, Iran could be used for a giant skating rink.
Now, as to preventing a first strike, no matter that we said we might use nuclear weapons first in a defense of Europe, no, I don’t think we would have, and I certainly don’t think we would with respect to Iran.
But, we have plenty of options short of nuclear weapons for inflicting enormous damage on Iran, given a sufficient provocation, so as to cripple their nuclear program.
Given the failure of sanctions, this is our military option.
Our role in the security of the world is vastly different from anybody else’s. We have the strategic role. We have to preclude any country from even thinking about starting a war.
This is what “peace through strength” means.
And, this is why we should not become “decisively engaged” in regional wars. In 2000, as a candidate, George W. Bush understood this. However, he violated this position when he got us into re-constructing Afghanistan and Iraq. We, and the peace of the world, are worse off for Bush violating the position he himself stated as a candidate. We need to return to “peace through strength.”