Kennedy in a January news conference.
His excuses are totally bogus. All it takes is a list of the current acceptable ID posted at each poll. We've already had Voter ID in one election. Election officials are already trained.
Wisconsin Voter ID alert.
FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.
He has plenty of time, he just wants phony Democrat votes.
Democrats can hook up illegals and others with services all the time.
Why can’t they get the incredibly small number of people without id, id well before the election, it’s free in WI if you’re poor.
The reason is they can’t do voter fraud as much if voter id is the law.
the only reason that this is done is to support voter fraud.
no other reason, no logic behind it.
just rat lies.
blessings, bobo
Solution without voter ID. Check list at polling place of deceased and felons. Requires no ID but would eliminate voting the graveyard and felons voting illegally.
They have them sign a certification that if they vote more than once, they understand the will be prosecuted.
We must not let them steal this election with voter fraud.
The Lefties in Wisconsin, like Kennedy, can only win by underhanded shennanegans and, of course, using the Liberal Circuit Court Madison judges. This is getting old. Talk about obstruction!
Cry me a river. The Court should rule in the ordinary course. Since when did a functionary like Kennedy get to determine the docket of the Wisconsin Supreme Court?
In other words, the ballot boxes have already been stuffed.
“”There’s not enough time,” Kennedy said”
Get the ID NOW! What’s the problem?
Why wait until there is a final decision. Get the ID now! Problem solved!
All of the Democrat fraudmisters are spinning this lie. One of the Elections Commissioner in one of the most politically corrupt counties in Minnesota is spinning this same fable almost word for word
“Walker and Van Hollen are Republicans.”
NO MENTION that KENNEDY is a DEMOCRAT. How odd.
“The groups involved in the two cases - the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin, the Milwaukee branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and the immigrant rights group Voces de la Frontera - have asked the Supreme Court not to take the case at this time. “
AND..... what do these three groups have in common?
Think of him as Sejanus, and those judges? tsk tsk tsk!
Three things:
First, the law was passed long ago - so people had plenty of time to get their IDs. If they didn’t bother before the law got shot down, it’s not the Supreme Court’s fault.
Second, if the state cannot train its poll workers to read an ID in 8 weeks, they need to go to liquor stores, and pick up some people there - it’s not very hard to read IDs.
Third, the state also had plenty of time to train its people, unless they were STUPID ENOUGH to ignore the law, based on the assumption that the courts would do their dirty work. If that were the case, then it’s also not the Supreme Court’s problem.
(I guess I’ll keep going)
Fourth, the 5 people* in the state that do not have IDs, but are legal voters, can vote provisionally, and then, if needed (which usually isn’t the case, when it’s only 5 people*), they can go to the state and get their IDs, and then have their votes counted. The 863,489 others that will now have to vote provisionally, claiming they don’t have ID, won’t bother, since they won’t be able to get a fake ID from the state that easily.
Fifth, didn’t the Supreme Court already rule Voter ID is legal. If so, it shouldn’t take long to slap-down the judges that ignore them.
Sixth, having an ‘inconvenient’ court timetable has never been a valid excuse in a court (that I know of).
Seventh, this ‘Elections Chief’ was more than welcome to IGNORE the courts and train the poll workers on how to read IDs - then, if the ultimate outcome was to not require ID, it’s easy enough to tell the poll workers just that.
Eighth - likewise, this ‘Elections Chief’ could have obtained legitimate IDs for the 5 legal people* that needed them - and not worried about the court outcome. He chose instead to use them as pawns in his political game.
Finally - it’s clear that he’s trying to game the system by dragging this out.
*I’m not sure about the number of legal voters that don’t have any ID. I chose 5 as a safe number, but please forgive me if it’s 2, or 3, instead.