Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thousands of Chinese protesters besiege Japanese embassy
Japan Today ^ | Sep. 15, 2012 - 09:00PM JST

Posted on 09/15/2012 3:42:36 PM PDT by DeaconBenjamin

Thousands of Chinese besieged the Japanese embassy in Beijing on Saturday, hurling rocks, eggs and bottles as protests broke out in other major cities in China amid growing tension between Asia’s two biggest economies over a group of disputed islands.

Paramilitary police with shields and batons barricaded the embassy, holding back and occasionally fighting with slogan-chanting, flag-waving protesters who at times appeared to be trying to storm the building.

“Return our islands! Japanese devils get out!” some shouted. One of them held up a sign reading: “For the respect of the motherland, we must go to war with Japan.”

Protester Liu Gang, a migrant worker from the southern region of Guangxi, said: “We hate Japan. We’ve always hated Japan. Japan invaded China and killed a lot of Chinese. We will never forget.”

By early evening, police had succeeded in persuading some onlookers and would-be protesters to leave. Rings of anti-riot police stood guard in front of the embassy, apparently readying for a long night.

“I think it’s time for the Chinese government to get tougher. Look at what the ordinary people feel. The government should respond,” said one onlooker who came to protest and who gave his family name as Xue.

“I don’t mean war, but tougher action like sanctions. You can see how much Japan depends on our economy. Then don’t sell them any rare earths,” he said, referring to elements mined in China and key to advanced technologies for the defense, electronics and renewable-energy industries.

Japan said its foreign minister had cut short a visit to Australia and flown back to Tokyo.

The long-standing territorial dispute escalated dramatically on Friday when China sent six surveillance ships to a group of uninhabited islets in the East China Sea, raising tension between the two countries to its highest level since 2010.

China, which has similar disputes elsewhere with other neighbors, was responding to Japan’s decision on Tuesday to buy the islands, which Tokyo calls the Senkaku and Beijing calls the Diaoyu, from a private Japanese owner despite Chinese warnings against doing so.

Sino-Japanese ties have long been plagued by China’s bitter memories of Japan’s military aggression in the 1930s and 1940s and present rivalry over resources - the islands are believed to be surrounded by energy-rich waters - and regional clout.

Relations between the two countries, whose business and trade ties have blossomed in recent years, chilled in 2010, after Japan arrested a Chinese trawler captain whose boat collided with Japanese Coast Guard vessels near the islands.

In Shanghai, streets around the Japanese consulate, in the western part of town, were cordoned off. Hundreds of police let small groups of people in at a time to protest.

China’s official Xinhua news agency said big anti-Japan protests were also held in the Chinese cities of Xian, Changsha, Nanjing and Qingdao. Japanese media reported outbreaks of violence as people attacked Japanese restaurants and businesses.

“Armed police and police officers have been dispatched to protest sites to maintain order,” Xinhua said in an English-language report, the first mention of the unrest by mainstream Chinese media.

Japan’s Kyodo news agency said that the demonstrations were the biggest in China since the two countries normalised diplomatic relations in 1972.

Pictures on China’s popular Twitter-like Sina Weibo showed protests in other, smaller cities, and pictures of looting of shops and destruction of Japanese cars.

There have been sporadic protests around China throughout the week, although those in Beijing had been small and largely peaceful.

The latest dispute flared up last month after Japan detained a group of Chinese activists who had landed on the islands.

Diplomats say Tokyo and Beijing want to keep the row from escalating, but managing the situation can be difficult given that China is undergoing a leadership change, an election is looming in Japan and mutual mistrust runs deep.

China’s ruling Communist Party, which likes to project an image of stability, rarely permits protests to take place. While Beijing is under strong popular pressure to take a tough line with Japan, it will also be cautious not to let the protests spin out of control.

“I think the government is encouraging this,” said one protester, who gave his name as Uda Chen.

“They could have stopped all of us approaching when we were at the subway station. The government has taught us to be anti-Japanese at school, so if they want us to stop it would be like slapping their own mouths,” he added.

The influential Chinese tabloid, the Global Times, published by Communist Party mouthpiece the People’s Daily, said backing off was not an option for China.

“China should be confident about strategically overwhelming Japan,” it wrote, saying the Chinese military should “increase their preparation and intensify their deterrence” against Japan.

“China will not shy away if Japan chooses to resort to its military,” the widely read paper added.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: rentamob
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: enduserindy

there =their


41 posted on 09/15/2012 6:21:03 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: enduserindy

“There is a BIG difference between ‘protectionism’ and sending jobs and wealth to our enemies”

Are your argument wires crossed? We know that. I think you mean to say there’s a difference between bad protectionism and whatever it is you advocate.

“free trade should be fair trade”

Fair trade is protectionism. Free trade is free trade.


42 posted on 09/15/2012 6:26:23 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

America’s day in the sun is no more.


43 posted on 09/15/2012 6:45:46 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: crz

You are correct. I have myself, after intense study, have come to the same conclusion.


44 posted on 09/15/2012 11:16:21 PM PDT by Anti-Hillary (Barry, Barry quite contrary, how does your government grow?...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: crz

You are correct. I have myself, after intense study, have come to the same conclusion.


45 posted on 09/15/2012 11:16:32 PM PDT by Anti-Hillary (Barry, Barry quite contrary, how does your government grow?...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

“Even with our resources autarchy would produce what they call a “vampire economy,” in which we feed off preexisting capital until we die.”

And sending all that capital, industrial jobs and technology to Communist China is healthy? I think our interests would have been better served elsewhere.


46 posted on 09/16/2012 11:15:55 AM PDT by enduserindy (Conservative Dead Head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

Its is our problem if we are competing with slave labor. Advocating slave labor for the US? I believe in free trade but only with nations on par with us in standard of living and freedom and that are not seeking to harm us. China fails both of those tests.


47 posted on 09/16/2012 12:45:48 PM PDT by enduserindy (Conservative Dead Head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
What’s the alternative, self-suffuciency? Ask the Nazis his that turns out.

The Chinese use of rural population as a vast labor pool is more reminiscent of Nazi use of foreign and slave labor to achieve peak industrial output in late 1944.

As far as not doing business with China, didn't an enforced policy of not doing business with adversaries during the cold war work out fairly well?

48 posted on 09/17/2012 2:54:43 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson