There may be no anti-Islamic movie at all

CS Monitor ^ | 09-12-2012 | Dan Murphy

[bronxville]

[...]Now comes the part with the compelling case of no movie at all.

Abdurrahman writes (embedded link):

If you watch closely, you can see that when the actors are reading parts of the script that do not contain Islam-specific language, the audio from the sound stage is used (the audio that was recorded as the actors were simultaneously being filmed). But anytime the actors are referring to something specific to the religion (the Prophet Muhammed, the Quran, etc.) the audio recorded during filming is replaced with a poorly executed post-production dub. And if you look EVEN closer, you can see that the actors’ mouths are saying something other than what the dub is saying.

For example, at 2:53, the voiceover says “His name is Muhammed. And we can call him The Father Unknown.” In this case, the whole line is dubbed, and it appears the actor is actually saying, “His name is George (?). And we can call him The Father Unknown.” ...once you start to look for these dubs, it’s hard to see anything else.

And Grey writes (embedded link):

As the video above — cut from the YouTube video tied to a global controversy — shows, nearly all of the names in the movie's "trailer" — is a compilation of the most clumsily overdubbed moments from what is in reality an incoherent, haphazardly-edited set of scenes. Among the overdubbed words is "Mohammed," suggesting that the footage was taken from a film about something else entirely. The footage also suggests multiple video sources — there are obvious and jarring discrepancies among actors and locations... whoever made (it) may well have made use of little more than the standard editing software Final Cut Pro — far from a cast and crew of over 100 and millions of dollars. http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Backchannels/2012/0912/There-may-be-no-anti-Islamic-movie-at-all

[Elendur]

Well, I guess the obvious answer is a false flag operation to get the Islamic horde cover for their coordinated attacks on 9/11 anniversary.
///
i agree. and it’s curious that Google is controlled by liberals, and have removed many conservative videos...
yet they “refuse” to remove this one,
even after Obama requests it... ?

[Daffynition]

Thanks for straightening me out. :) That # I used was based on what I heard on Fox from some on-scene reporter describing the population that was storming the consulate.

The whole notion he espoused that the Libyans were stirred up from what they *saw* on the internet seemed far fetched.

[Pollster1]

Thanks for straightening me out. :) That # I used was based on what I heard on Fox from some on-scene reporter describing the population that was storming the consulate.

It is incredibly tempting to assume that journalists know what they are doing. Sadly, journalists, even at Fox, are less professional than almost any other group I can imagine.