Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
Yep.

Proud exposer of your silliness.

39 posted on 09/13/2012 9:58:41 AM PDT by Lakeshark (I don't care for Mitt; the alternative is unthinkable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Lakeshark
Proud exposer of your silliness.

Nothing could be sillier than claiming to be a conservative while supporting liberals.

41 posted on 09/13/2012 10:01:38 AM PDT by EternalVigilance ("The opposite of compromise is character." -- Frederick Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark; Jim Robinson; BlackElk; wagglebee; Steve Schulin; Gelato
So, let's take one state as an example: California, a state that has the electoral votes which will likely determine whether or not Barack Obama wins reelection.

The choices will be:

Tom Hoefling, [me] a pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-border security, pro-Constitution, peace through strength Reagan conservative.

Barack Obama, the most liberal [alleged] president in history.

Mitt Romney, the most liberal governor in history, a candidate who has already quite obviously ceded California's electoral votes to Obama.

Rosanne Barr, a crazed leftist.

Gary Johnson, a pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, isolationist Libertarian.

So, in addition to telling us who you would vote for with such choices, please explain how it is "silly" for a conservative to vote for me.

*Jim, I pinged you to this exchange because you're an influential citizen of the great state of California.

45 posted on 09/13/2012 10:15:44 AM PDT by EternalVigilance ("The opposite of compromise is character." -- Frederick Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson