Posted on 09/11/2012 7:20:38 PM PDT by EveningStar
Bookmark
I mean it just seemd like it has been posted multiple times today.....but maybe I have just seen headlined on the other sights I go to....
Just another ad for The Disaster.
No one takes the NY Times seriously anymore. I wouldn’t take it for free.
It turns out that you're right. When I did a search, I searched on the title and got nothing, so I posted the article.
However, I just now searched on "Bush" and got some hits:
Left Politicizes 9/11 by Bashing Bush (This is not surprising)
NY Times Reporter Accuses Bush of 'Negligence' Regarding 9/11 (What a disgusting pos)
A lot of people prefer to read an article about an article rather than the article itself.
I guess I was just being cranky.... 9/11 and our embassies being attacked and our government doing NOTHING....
Typical NYT BS. This is the best they can do?
So sayeth NY Slimes writers. Same paper that interviewed an unrepentant Pentagon bomber and splashed the article in the Slimes on 9-11-2001.
FUNYT.
Bush prevented multiple FOLLOWUP attacks on Los Angeles, the Brooklyn Bridge, Hethrow Airport, etc. without any acknowledgement from the Pravda Press.
If the goal was to “justify war”, why not permit the other attacks? To show “why we fight”?
FUNYT.
And then she stepped in to “represent” BP in negotiations after the Gulf Oil spill.
For such a lousy track record, she sure gets high profile work.
30 pieces of silver to sell out America.
In fact, I just saw a Sixty Minutes video where they interviewed a CIA operative whose team had Bin Laden in their sights in 1998 or ‘99 and were refused permission to terminate him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.