If I had stated that Republican internals showing Romney down yesterday without a link I was probably referring to a politico article and what I've been hearing from others. Neither of them I would never be able to claim "as fact" without a real source. Do you have a link to my statement claiming that it is factual or are you just quoting what I said based on what's been going around?
At this point, I've seen no polling data (except one which I posted) that would prove those alledged numbers to be incorrect. So, just WHO really has the burden of proof that Romney is ahead?
Wrong question. YOU have the burden of proof that shows a citation for the Romney camp having an internal poll showing he was down five in Ohio.
That was your flat claim, one that you refuse to back or retract.
THAT is the burden of proof.
But, as usual, you will ignore the demand. That is because you are a duplicitous and bald-faced liar.