Doesn't anyone wonder to themselves WHY the media AND Obama's regime repeatedly suggested they were most afraid of Romney getting in the primaries last year?
Does no one consider that Obama and the Ruling Class CHOSE Romney to be his opposition? Chosen to lose? Chosen to hit the mat in the third round by the Movers and Shakers?
Or does the concept that we have already gone Soviet in our election system under Obama seem an impossibility to most?
I don’t believe that Mitt was ‘chosen to lose’, I think that it was his liberalism and instinctual opposition to conservatism that most interested the GOP-e in him, they had to find a man that could deal with this Palin/tea party/Reagan threat, and the man who so despises conservatism and who has fought that battle his entire life, was the perfect choice, it took two turns to get him, but they got him.
Either way they win, if Mitt wins then they get Mitt, if Mitt loses, then they still stopped the conservatives and gave themselves years to neuter and dilute the tea party.
Donna Brazile, a 'Rat mugwump on Georgie Clintonopoulos's show on Sunday mornings, told the table last January that every time Romney had a good primary night, Obama had a better one, because Romney was Obama's preferred nominee -- the weakest candidate in the GOP field.
So she said, in a moment of candor.