To: Wuli
Romney spoke of two areas of health insurance reform that he too would seek to put in place.
Another distinction without a difference.
Whether he used the word "ObamaCare" isn't the issue to a conservative but whether or not he is truly willing to do away with the monstrosity that is ObamaCare completely.
He is not; he wants to keep many facets of ObamaCare, and much like his RomneyCare, will more than likely be pushing for the Individual Mandate as well shortly.
He has already reneged on his Pro-Life pledge, why would you think any of his so-called conservatism is to believed?
51 posted on
09/09/2012 7:57:23 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
To: SoConPubbie
He tossed in “health of the mother” without defining it. That asks for clarification, not knee jerk name calling.
57 posted on
09/09/2012 7:59:53 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(let me ABOs run loose, lew (or is that lou?))
To: SoConPubbie
“He is not; he wants to keep many facets of Obamacare”
Your evidence to date is slim to none.
In the entire TV interview he only mentioned two areas of health insurance reform he too would address, and in neither case did he mention retaining any element of Obamacare that addressed those two things, as is from Obamacare. In fact no where does he speak of trying to keep Obamacare and no where in the conversation were “many factes of Obamacare” discussed.
So, where is your evidence?
64 posted on
09/09/2012 8:03:21 PM PDT by
Wuli
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson