To: HiTech RedNeck
Mitt has said he thinks state-passed Romneycare is grand for Massachusetts. How you can blow that up into a claim like yours is a puzzle for the ages.
Mitt, through his surrogates, I believe Pam Bondi, has already gone on record that they will be pushing implementation of RomneyCare in all 50 states, which means by default, an individual Mandate.
You're pushing a known liar who has been stating all this year how Pro-Life he was and then turns around an publicly states he is in favor for Abortion for Rape, Incest, Life, and HEALTH of the mother.
Effectively invalidating his so-called Pro-Life position.
Mitt is the King of Parsing a position by his statements or even out-right lying but we're supposed to believe him?
22 posted on
09/09/2012 7:42:09 PM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
To: SoConPubbie
Oy vey, the infinitely abusable (by both sides) HEALTH OF THE MOTHER issue. Heaven forbid either side should go into detail about what they mean, of course. They they can sling insults freely and never make an ounce of sense.
If Romney wants to stump for every state making the dodo the state bird... let him. The crucial point is that this can NOT be a federal mandate.
28 posted on
09/09/2012 7:44:23 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(let me ABOs run loose, lew (or is that lou?))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson