Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beck Dispels Biggest Mormon Myths in Blaze TV Special
The Blaze ^ | 9/7/12 | Billy Hallowell

Posted on 09/09/2012 10:23:41 AM PDT by Mozilla

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 301-315 next last
To: driftdiver

Post #27 covers a some of many reasons Mormons are not Christians.


181 posted on 09/09/2012 2:04:54 PM PDT by bmwcyle (Corollary - Electing the same person over and over and expecting a different outcome is insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Comment #182 Removed by Moderator

To: Mr Rogers
Did he mention how the Mormons would vote in unison for anyone the ‘Prophet’ said to vote for, and their neighbors drove them out for that?

I remember the JFK campaign, when people were saying the Pope would be running the country if JFKL was elected, and it was a fad for people to use red fingernail polish to paint Cardinal caps on George Washington's image on quarters.

Just saying.

183 posted on 09/09/2012 3:03:25 PM PDT by Gorzaloon (The Google thing is in the yard again. Sniffed the laundry, now it's looking in the septic tank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan
“There‘s nothing you will find in the temple that you won’t find in the Old or New Testament.”

Nothing, eh? That's rich. Except for maybe the masonic blood oaths and death penalties that were removed from the temple endowment ritual in 1990. But hey, I guess Jesus thought that anyone who didn't keep the masonic ritual secret deserved to have their throats slit from ear to ear, or to have their chests and bowls severed. Where are those practices in the temple of the Old Testament and New Testament?

You also don't hear about multiple gods existing in heaven in the Old or New Testaments.

The penalties made the temple ritual so cult like that the Church had to drop them out so as to stop scaring members out of the church. I guess Beck must have joined Mormonism after they took those parts of the temple endowment out.

What about the oath in the Temple Ritual until Utah petitioned for statehood, which required all Mormons to swear to seek revenge upon the Untied States government for the death of Joseph and Hyrum Smith? Sound pretty Christ like, doesn't it? I bet that one wasn't in the Old or New Testament.

I suspect that Beck doesn't personally know much about mormon doctrine, or the Church's history other than what his leaders tell him. Probably hasn't looked too much into it. Otherwise, he wouldn't say things like he does in this article that indicate his ignorance of Church history and doctrine.

BTW, all of the secret oaths made in the temple also sounds a lot like the "secret oaths and combinations" that are forbidden as evil in the Book of Mormon.

184 posted on 09/09/2012 3:06:49 PM PDT by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mozilla
***.... this dynamic ended 122 years ago and that the church takes a strong stance against it today.***

And yet,as late as 1976, during the US Bicententiniel, there were an estimated TEN THOUSAND mormons in Utah still practicing Polygamy.

185 posted on 09/09/2012 3:08:43 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
As i said, im no mormon and just caannot believe their theology, or their whole story. I see it as a merry tall tale scam that got out of hand. So i ask, why has it become so successful? How on earth do they get new members in this day and age?

Well, when the LDS are teaching converts, they just show the converts the good values and family emphasis that mormons hold--which are in fact mostly wholesome and attractive. They almost never mention all of the crazy doctrines and church history to the converts.

The only part of the church that converts are generally allowed to see is the good side. That is most likely why the church's convert rate is as high as it is. For the most part, the LDS convert people because they do not disclose all of the truth, only the favorable things. They cover up all of the scandalous doctrines, changes in doctrine, and bad parts of church history. This is often intentional as LDS Missionaries are often told by their superiors to stick "to the lesson plans" and not to mention doctrines that the lessons don't talk about.

However, some of this deception is also unintentional, because many mormons are unfamiliar with the church's past teachings and history and thus don't talk about it because they themselves do know that these things were ever taught or endorsed by the church.

186 posted on 09/09/2012 3:24:36 PM PDT by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

I agree the left accuses people of hate all the time, so why do you keep accusing me of hate?


187 posted on 09/09/2012 3:31:19 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212

Sorry, Dan that wasn’t meant for you.
And you are correct.


188 posted on 09/09/2012 3:33:22 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Gorzaloon

“I remember the JFK campaign, when people were saying the Pope would be running the country if JFKL was elected...”

What I wrote was historical fact. There is a reason why the kept being thrown out of places, and it was NOT prejudice against their religion. They voted as a solid block.

“In 1844, Smith created the Council of Fiftythat became “the Municipal department of the
Kingdom of God set up on the Earth, and from which all Law emanates.” The members
of the Council of Fifty and the leaders of the Mormon Church were identical. Thus, the
Nauvoo government took the form of a theocracy, a unified church and state.

The rapid development of Nauvoo’s economic and political power, along with rumors
about strange Mormon religious rituals, greatly unsettled other Illinois residents. They
particularly resented the Mormon practice of voting in elections as a bloc at the direction
of Joseph Smith. Then in 1844, Smith decided to run for president of the United States.
This combining of religion and politics further inflamed public opinion in Illinois. Nor
did all Mormons in Nauvoo approve of Joseph Smith’s political activities.”

http://search.yahoo.com/r/_ylt=A0oGdbnpF01QIxEA2O1XNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTEyYWJ0NXN0BHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMwRjb2xvA3NrMQR2dGlkA0RGUjVfNzc-/SIG=13ka69vml/EXP=1347258473/**http%3a//www.twyman-whitney.com/history120-121/readings/Persecution%2520of%2520the%2520Mormons.pdf


189 posted on 09/09/2012 3:33:43 PM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

The LDS church ended polygamy when the US government threatened to take the Temples.


190 posted on 09/09/2012 3:36:24 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you really want to annoy someone, point out something obvious that they are trying hard to ignore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

lds still practice polygamy, they hide it by calling it celestial marriage.
Oh and by looking the other way with their members are polygamist.


191 posted on 09/09/2012 3:39:24 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

;-) Beck is not going to tell the truth about mormonism, he can’t.


192 posted on 09/09/2012 3:46:26 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Springfield Reformer

Sure but that wasn’t the point.

The point was if you are going to use that as a reason to condemn someone you should know the history of Christianity.


193 posted on 09/09/2012 3:47:10 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: nclaurel

I know but it don’t mean we can’t dissect Romney’s religion anymore than Obama’s.


194 posted on 09/09/2012 3:52:01 PM PDT by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: svcw

One thing I noticed from studying polygamy in the US is that the Mormon Church doesn’t wink at things. If they tell you to do something, they expect you to do it. When they outlawed polygamy, they told the polygamists to go away. “Go to Canada or Mexico but you no longer exist in our eyes.”


195 posted on 09/09/2012 3:53:05 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you really want to annoy someone, point out something obvious that they are trying hard to ignore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Stegall Tx
He does explain that polygamy is not officially countenanced by the LDS today, but he did not do a very good job of explaining why they allowed it in the first place, nor the reasoning behind stopping the practice.

Technically, polygamy is still a mormon doctrine. Mormon scripture (D&C 132) still says polygamy is a good, divinely inspired institution. The church has never condemned the practice of polygamy. It has only told its members to temporarily stop doing it, because the US government and the federal army threatened to wipe out the church if it kept practicing it. With this threat over the church's head along with the church's hope to bolster Utah's application for statehood, the church finally promulgated a temporary ban on polygamy via the 1890 Manifesto. This ban does not repudiate polygamy as being wrong in of itself, but only says that until the prophet says otherwise that mormons should "refrain from contracting any marriage forbidden by the law of the land." Thus if the law of the land changes, polygamy will be ok under the wording of the manifesto. Also, all polygamous marriages contracted by members of the church up to that point in time were still allowed to stand by the church.

BTW, mormons believe in a ritual called "sealing" which joins a husband and wife in marriage for "time and all eternity." If the wife dies after being sealed to a husband, she is considered that husband's wife forever. If the husband survives his wife's decease and then gets "sealed" to another living woman, both women are considered his wives forever. Thus technically speaking, some mormons still believe they are practicing a form of celestial polygamy even today. The church approves these sealings so technically the church still approves of polygamy. Of course, the government doesn't much care about this as long as both wives are not living at the same time.

196 posted on 09/09/2012 3:54:37 PM PDT by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

When they outlawed polygamy, they told the polygamists to go away. “Go to Canada or Mexico but you no longer exist in our eyes.”
__________________________________________

When did that happen...

1 The prophet/president of the mormons Woodruff after his “proclamation in 1890 stayed in Utah and as the leadeer o0f the mormons and kept right on with his harem of polymous “wives”

as did the following prophets until the last one died in 1965...

Mormon men kept right on being “sealed” (married) in the temple to extra “wives” with whom they lived with ...(read sex here if youre from Rio Linda)

2. The Romneys ran away from the law in the US not the mormon religion...

It was a mormon colony that they began in Mexico...

ran from the mormon hierarchy in SLC..

After 1890 polymous couples would go down to Mexico to be “married” and then return to live in Utah...


197 posted on 09/09/2012 4:58:50 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Just do not beleive that to be correct, as my uncle married a woman who was from a polygamist union and the family lives in SLC and most are temple workers.
There are hundreds of polygamist families in SLC, and they are not thrown out of the SLC lds corporation.


198 posted on 09/09/2012 5:04:20 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

The LDS church ended polygamy when the US government threatened to take the Temples.
____________________________________

Ah no...

The mormons pretended to end polygamy in 1890 in order to have Utah become a state...

Utah became a stsate in 1896 100 years after the 16th state, Tennessee...

a couple of notes ...

1. The mormons kept the “rules” omn polygamy being necessary to become a god like their mo0rmon jesus....

and to go to the mormon afterlife...

1. The first member of congress from Utah was a known polygamous elected by voters from Utah who KNEW that he was such...

When he tried to be seated in Washington the Christians around the country rose up and petitioned that he not be allowed to sit on moral grounds...

although his mormon friends in Utah objected to his being expelled, there were SEVEN MILLION signatures sent to Washington from offended good people and he had to go back to Utah...

Oh Nana when did that happen ???

When the LDS “winked” years after 1890...


199 posted on 09/09/2012 5:09:43 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: old republic

Someone upthread mentioned that polygamy still existed under the name “celestial marriage”, but I didn’t understand how. I now see what they mean. Thanks for clearing that up for me.

I have seen D&C 132 as well as Official Declaration 1 (both are readily available online at lds.org) and you can pick up a D&C at just about any book store. The whole thing is there in writing if you wish to read it.

As I said before, I don’t mind that they choose to have doctrines that change depending on the current mood of a given national government. I just wish that they would be up front about it.


200 posted on 09/09/2012 5:48:07 PM PDT by Stegall Tx (Living off your tax dollars can be kinda fun, but not terribly profitable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 301-315 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson