That’s a ridiculous argument.
If your child came down with a dread disease, and you had to depend on “charity”(as another poster suggested) because your insurance company dropped his coverage, your life would be a freaking NIGHTMARE!
It’s the correct argument, health care is a service not a right. You may have a right at access but your neighbor should not be obligated to play your keeper and prop up your life by force.
Is this a limited government site, did I take a wrong turn and ended up at DU?