1 posted on
09/08/2012 5:05:22 PM PDT by
neverdem
To: neverdem
“rough-and-ready estimates are better than nothing and are often sufficient for policy-making.”
Uh-oh! Once a regulation gets put in, it stays. California declared isopropyl alcohol (you know, rubbing alcohol at the grocery store) to be a carcinogen, so every grocery, CVS, and Walgreens has a sign outside declaring that “this facility contains a chemical recognized to be a carcinogen”.
EPA will go so political with their “rough and ready estimates” that they’ll expand their power even more.
2 posted on
09/08/2012 5:17:52 PM PDT by
DBrow
To: neverdem
Informative - thank you!
BTT
6 posted on
09/08/2012 5:48:56 PM PDT by
mbj
To: neverdem
7 posted on
09/08/2012 5:52:57 PM PDT by
VanShuyten
("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
To: neverdem
the last thing these bastards need is more power.
8 posted on
09/08/2012 6:11:20 PM PDT by
bravo whiskey
(if the little things really annoy you, maybe it's because the big things are going well.)
To: neverdem
There are scads of naturally occurring substances that would NEVER pass EPA assessment, produced by the thousands of tons all around us. Many have industrial uses, from pesticides to plastics. There are very few synthetic alternatives that pass EPA muster. Hence, banning some synthetic chemicals has a serious positive impact on their accepted alternatives, especially if they are patented.
This "heightened risk assessment" stinks of political payoffs.
12 posted on
09/08/2012 8:15:46 PM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(The Slave Party Switcheroo: Economic crisis! Zero's eligibility Trumped!! Hillary 2012!!!)
To: El Gato; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; Dianna; ...
13 posted on
09/08/2012 8:27:02 PM PDT by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson