The LDS is officially a lot of things that scads of Mormons don’t actually follow along with.
Mitt, he’s anybody’s huckleberry if that gets him a political boost. Mitt is silly putty, not backbone. It probably will come to pass that the dogmatic Marxist will lose to the silly putty, but everybody needs to be ready to deal with the silly putty.
Good reasoning in your comment and well said. Some of my aunts, uncles and cousins were in and out of RLDS, but I don’t know much about it. As for politics, agreed also on that.
I see too many regulations against production from every level of government, from NGOs and individuals behind government, and have doubts that any likely political changes will stop the default process caused by favored constituencies getting what they demand (big spending on regulations, social pushes and debt flows). So I see a rare opportunity to see the political/regulator class fall from leadership for lack of revenues.
Maybe several presidents have unwittingly (and some maybe wittingly) helped us on the way to small government: bond collapse, default, repudiation and currency adjustment. Without valuable revenues from manufacturing, regulations and social efforts against small manufacturing operations and families will be unenforced and maybe, eventually abolished.
I don’t see any political solution to economic problems or social diseases. Our country is too mobbed-up by the unproductive and counterproductive, IMO, and many members of the mob are well paid from debt to prevent production.
Mitt is a true and dedicated Mormon, and you need to quit lying about that.
Mitt did not earn his position and power with the religion, and the approval of the Qurom of 70, and the personal, in person approval of his Pope, for this presidential run, by not being a good and faithful Mormon, in fact, a Temple Mormon.