Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tallguy
The Iranians have been working on missiles for the last few years. In addition, Russia and/or China have been helping them. It used to be carriers were thin hulled for ease of maneuverability-which makes them vulnerable.

Remember the Argentinians sunk a five billion dollar British destroyer with a $250,000 dollar Exocet missile.

51 posted on 09/08/2012 4:03:21 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: AEMILIUS PAULUS

To my way of thinking the only real threat to a large deck CVA (actually sinking it) would be from a large, heavy-weight torpedo designed to snap a keel. A mine could do the same thing, but a carrier isn’t likely to be steaming over a minefield — except perhaps in the Gulf. Hammering away at aircraft carriers with bombs, kamikazes and so forth may kill a lot of crewmen and take the carrier out of battle. But the vessel itself is a very compartmentalized and the crews are (supposed to be) well versed in damage control.

USS Franklin, USS Forestall, USS Enterprise, USS Oriskany... all these ships suffered devastating attacks and fires and all survived.

Several US carriers lost in WW2 were actually sunk by our own cruisers & destroyers because they were dead in the water. But they were still afloat. Given the lengths the US went to to repair that destroyer hit in Aden, I’d say we aren’t going to finish off one of our own carriers. Very bad for morale.


52 posted on 09/08/2012 4:22:00 PM PDT by Tallguy (It's all 'Fun and Games' until somebody loses an eye!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson