Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stanne

Comments #27 and #28 by DManA and RFEngineer put a stop to the justification game being played out to defend the Catholic priest. Refer to those comments for further clarification. That’ll be sufficient.


55 posted on 09/08/2012 8:49:48 AM PDT by James C. Bennett (An Australian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: James C. Bennett

Nobady is trying to justify anything.

A cursory look at Fr. Groeschel’s work bio, which takes a lot less effort than “refer to this number comment and then that number comment” will tell the laziest of commentors that Fr. Groschel’s character and occupation run completely adverse to perverted activity.

He is above reproach and it would take some serious proof to indicate otherwise.

You are wasting your own and my time.

Do one twintieth of what he’s done in any one year and you will be too busy to even think of perverted activity.

Ignorance is dangerous.


56 posted on 09/08/2012 9:03:27 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson