“You and James both seem just a little to familiar with the behavior and psychology of pedophiles.”
You may wish to ignore and make light of this. Those that have lived through the horrors of sexual predators and have seen first-hand what they do, have studied and learned their psychology, and have acted to make sure they are held responsible know that you simply do not understand.
It is an objective fact that this statement is consistent with sexual predator psychology. He said “sorry” as he should have. He may well be a crazy old man with nothing behind it, but that he was discussing a context that was clear - and made a cogent, and concise argument, however wrong and misguided, for excusing sexual predation amongst his colleagues should give pause.
You find it funny that someone would point out that there should be a concern, and then, finally, you claim it’s bigotry, then you say those that have any concern are themselves pedophiles.
You are the one that would excuse pedophilia, and would discount any concern over expressed statements for leniency of sexual predators, and attempt to divert attention with specious charges of bigotry and pedophilia.
So sorry to bore you, but, I find your protestations a bit much. Perhaps too much.
Their dogged defense of their chosen establishment is akin to fanboyism:
http://techreport.com/blog/21294/the-science-of-fanboyism
It’s a lost cause to use evidence and reason with these type of people. Due to the lack of a working internal mechanism to clean out the rot (in turn due to internal opposition against recognising the pre-existent problem), you will continue to see more tongue-slips and even more exposés making it to the public eye until the whole establishment crumbles to dust.