WTH did you do to BlackElk, give him a wedgie or somethin'?
He sounds like he's out of his tree ('tree', get it? BlackELK, tree, ya know? ha ha! ;).
Say Blackie? Looks like ya hit the jackpot pal...
(don't spend it all in one place, ok?)
I guess I must have. :)) What is it you did? LOL
How clever! You know how to post photos in support of the usual tiresome lies and in your ongoing pep rally for Mittler!!!
Of course, since there is nothing in #'d paragraphs 1-9 of my #26 that you attempt to refute as to Mittler's sorry POS track record. Therefore you concede the substance of each of them. How could you do otherwise???
NICMARLO:
I went to your homepage. As to your 15 Tea Party principles, Mittler would piss on all but 10 and 11. And he would not completely agree with 10. Both major party candidates CLAIM they would keep the Bush tax rates on those with incomes below $250,000. Romney would beef up the special interest tax cuts above that level, which are no skin off my nose regardless of outcome. He would also cut corporate tax rates. Ditto.
You seem to imagine that there is some meaningful difference between Mittler and Obozo. They are BOTH evils. You seem to imagine that God Himself wants you to vote for the "lesser" of two baby-killing, fudge-packer agenda embracing, gun-grabbing, Church persecuting, medical system ruining, etc. evils.
You also seem to imagine that opposing Mittler somehow equates to being a "born again Christian" who hates Mormons. I am a Roman Catholic. If Jesus Christ is not my Savior, I cannot imagine Who would be. I believe that the Scriptural reference to being born again references two sacraments: baptism and confirmation. Within Catholicism, one's god parents take various pledges on the infant's behalf and the process is completed when that same infant has reached the age of reason and, at confirmation, renews those pledges rationally in his/her own right. Thus he/she is "born again of water" (baptism) "and the Spirit" (confirmation). Nothing in my baptism or confirmation (or in my life experience with Mormons generally) would tolerate much less encourage hatred for Mormons as Mormons. The Mormons I have known have been reliably pro-life and pro-family and responsibly conservative unlike Mittler who should be an embarrassment to them. I challenge you to cite even a single instance here wherein I have opposed Mittler BECAUSE he is a Mormon.
Also, see the second paragraph of this post which was posted to mkjessup. It applies to you as well. Rather than defend your candidate's public track record (an impossibility for any actual conservative), you simply CLAIM that Obozo is worse.
I might add that for someone who makes the claim that God somehow would make choices between two social revolutionary monsters, you do have, other than the Tea Party stuff, a remarkably religiously preachy homepage.