Posted on 09/07/2012 1:01:37 PM PDT by NYer
She’s a Kennedy first. Morals come last.
Only GOD can disprove your statements.
I believe in a life of abundance, Caroline Kennedy obviously not.
No, Anyone showing where the leadership of the RCC has taken a Kennedy or other high profile ‘Catholic’ to task, much less excommed them could EASILY disprove my statements.
Can you? No. Because it’s not happened. No matter how blatantly they spit in God’s face and claim their Catholicsm, the Kennedy/Pelosi Catholics are untouched by the RCC leadership. Period.
So again, show me where they have been slapped down publicly and I will gladly admit my error.
I hear ya Norm.
Praying for you, O'Really.
Now that’s pretty damn dumb. I can believe that the Bloviator is that dumb. He’s never met a fence he didn’t want to straddle. The flag he nails to the mast is Jello.
That’s why they’re said to worship Moloch, because they sacrifice babies. If they believe in anythng,they believe in baby sacrifice. Just read DU sometime, if you can stand it. Some monster over there-female at that-made a thread about how she unapologetically wants abortion on demand for any reason whatsoever and no woman should ever feel ashamed for having one. She was actually celebratory about it. Hard core ‘rats are evil, no two ways about it.
I never thought about it before but you are correct!
LLS
While the “Old money/powerful New England family” is a well worn plot device, the specifics of many stories are obvious variations on Kennedy exploits.
And there are HUNDREDS of books, if not thousands with identifiably “Kennedy” plots/backstories.
That O’Reilly is “stunned” by Kennedy’s remarks says volumes about Bill.
Talk about clueless.
LLS
Was her mom that smart...really?
I honestly don’t know. But she sure was a style icon.
I had about twelve paragraphs written before I self-redacted and just arrowed down to a few clear truths:
1.In the USA, we all have freedom of religion enshrined as one of the primary points in all of our other laws.
2.No religion/church is forced to officially accept/acknowledge an individuals self-avowed claim to “membership status”, nor are they required to dispute false claims.
No such “right” to fraudulently claim membership exists under our laws. It is strictly a private matter. A civil claim can be made by either party, if one or the other side abuses the others, resulting in measurable damages.
3.Nothing in our laws preclude any church from denouncing fictitious claims of membership, or from announcing the severing of membership, publically, of former members, if they so choose.
Victim calls Philadelphia Abortion Doc Kermit Gosnell a "Monster"
Everyone is responsible for their OWN soul, not their Priest;s or their Congressman's....their OWN.
I keep asking that question on FR and never get a response.
I have only one conclusion to make and it's obvious.
I don’t have to ‘act’ like anything to see that if the leadership did anything they were thoroughly ignored. The Pelosi/Kennedy clans are still out there redefining Catholic theology and making a mockery of the faith and it’s adherents.
Nor do I have to ‘act’ like anything to see you excusing this lack of moral leadership. Target your outrage where it will do some good. IE the source of the problem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.