Now it seems it's gone from "if you don't leave, we won't come help you" to "if ypou don't leave, we'll drag you away."
1 posted on
09/07/2012 6:29:50 AM PDT by
fredhead
To: fredhead
So, if you decide to stay and protect your home from looters, you’ll be dragged away and hit with weapons charges, too?
To: fredhead
When are a majority of peeps going to stand up and demand a reversal of the criminalization of everything?
4 posted on
09/07/2012 6:33:36 AM PDT by
Paladin2
To: fredhead
A similar program worked well for the Germans in Lodz. They got some pushback in Warsaw, but eventually implemented the program after dealing with the holdouts.
5 posted on
09/07/2012 6:36:50 AM PDT by
PAR35
To: fredhead
Not to worry though, the government has some very nice camps these families can relocate to in case of such an evacuation order. “Never mind the barbed wire, that’s just to keep out animals and such.”
To: fredhead
If the government is saying it doesn’t have the resources to protect those who stay, fine, don’t drag them out and cause even more drama.
Have the persons staying behind sign a waiver that they understand due to whatever the emergency is, they should not expect any assistance because it will be already be allocated elsewhere or it is not feasible to have resources in the affected area during the emergency.
Some people will fight desperately if you try to take them out of their homes.
This NC legislation may be counter to the 4th Amendment.
9 posted on
09/07/2012 6:50:22 AM PDT by
Molon Labbie
(Prep. Now. Live Healthy, take your Shooting Iron daily.)
To: fredhead
Now it seems it's gone from "if you don't leave, we won't come help you" to "if you don't leave, we'll drag you away."
Not elaborate enough. Under Roberts it would be, "if you don't leave, you'll pay a not leaving tax that will be colloquially known as a fine or penalty (though still actually a tax), after you don't show up for the hearing, you'll be dragged away.
10 posted on
09/07/2012 6:52:25 AM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
("I have a new zest for life!"--Cal from Las Vegas)
To: fredhead
12 posted on
09/07/2012 6:53:09 AM PDT by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: fredhead
It has nothing to do with saving your life but taking your money.
13 posted on
09/07/2012 7:04:37 AM PDT by
bgill
To: fredhead
They are simply trying to make a safe working environment for the looters.
15 posted on
09/07/2012 7:20:59 AM PDT by
IMR 4350
To: fredhead
Chief Justice would beg to disagree. A fine for inaction is really just a tax, well that is what the legislation meant to say....
16 posted on
09/07/2012 8:09:49 AM PDT by
CSM
(Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
To: fredhead
They should pass this in New Orleans. Those folks down there could not be dumber. They ignore the warning every time.
17 posted on
09/07/2012 8:22:03 AM PDT by
napscoordinator
(Paul Ryan/Rick Santorum 2012....That would be the best scenario ever.)
To: fredhead
You knew this was coming from the government oppressors.
They want total control, total compliance or else.
19 posted on
09/07/2012 9:18:53 AM PDT by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson