Indeed, the Clinton-Lewinsky defenseaccord which the feminists signed onto, can be regarded as feminism's Nazi-Soviet Pact. Their calculation was both simple and crude: If Clinton was removed, Hillary would go too. But she was their link to patronage and power, and they couldn't imagine losing that. Their kind was finally in control of the White House, and the conservative enemies of their beautiful future were not.
.....In the 1930s, Nazis used "The Third Way" to characterize their own brand of national socialism as a equidistant between the "internationalist" socialism of the Soviet Union and the capitalism of the West. Trotskyists used "The Third Way" as a term to distinguish their own Marxism from Stalinism and capitalism. In the 1960s, New Leftists used "The Third Way" to define their politics as an independent socialism between the Soviet gulag and America's democracy.
But as the history of Nazism, Trotskyism and the New Left have shown, there is no "Third Way." There is the capitalist, democratic way based on private property and individual rightsa way that leads to liberty and universal opportunity. And there is the socialist way of group identities, group rights, a relentless expansion of the political state, restricted liberty and diminished opportunity. The Third Way is not a path to the future. It is just the suspension between these two destinations. It is a bad faith attempt on the part of people who are incapable of giving up their socialist schemes to escape the taint of their discredited past.
Is there a practical difference in the modus operandi of Clinton narcissism and Clinton messianism? I think there is, and it is the difference between "triangulation"a cynical compromise to hang onto power until the next election cycle, and "The Third Way"a cynical deception to ensure the continuance of Us, until we acquire enough power to transform everyone else. It is the difference between the politics of getting what you can, and the politics of changing the world.
The idealistic missionaries in this true tale bite their tongues and betray their principles, rather than betray him. They do so because in Bill Clinton they see a necessary vehicle of their noble ambition and uplifting dreams. He, too, cares about social justice, about poor people and blacks (or so he makes them believe). They will serve him and lie for him and destroy for him, because he is the vessel of their hope.
Because Bill Clinton "cares," he is the vital connection to the power they need to accomplish the redemption. Because the keys to the state are within Clinton's grasp, he becomes in their eyes the only prospect for advancing the progressive cause. Therefore, they will sacrifice anything and everythingprinciple, friends, countryto make him succeed.
But Bill Clinton is not like those who worship him, corrupting himself and others for a higher cause. Unlike them, he betrays principles because he has none. He will even betray his country, but without the slightest need to betray it for something elsefor an idea, a party, or a cause. He is a narcissist who sacrifices principle for power because his vision is so filled with himself that he cannot tell the difference.
But the idealists who serve himthe Stephanopoulos's, the Ickes's, the feminists, the progressives and Hillary Clintoncan tell the difference. Their cynicism flows from the very perception they have of right and wrong. They do it for higher ends. They do it for the progressive faith. They do it because they see themselves as having the power to redeem the world from evil. It is that terrifyingly exalted ambition that fuels their spiritual arrogance and justifies their sordid and, if necessary, criminal means.
And that is why they hate conservatives. They hate you because you are killers of their dream. Because you are defenders of a Constitution that thwarts their cause. They hate you because your "reactionary" commitment to individual rights, to a single standard and to a neutral and limited state obstructs their progressive designs. They hate you because you are believers in property and its rights as the cornerstones of prosperity and human freedom; because you do not see the market economy as a mere instrument for acquiring personal wealth and political war chests, to be overcome in the end by bureaucratic schemes."................. Source June 2000
AMEN!
Indonesia's Bung Sukarno used that same slogan, with that same exact meaning, in the late 50's and early 60's, to describe the policy of Sukarno's regime, even as he allowed himself to be cultivated like a cabbage-patch by the Soviets; and a large Indonesian Communist Party, the PKI, grew up all around him, using him as a Trojan horse just the way the Iranian Communist Tudeh Party had used Mossadegh, and Chilean MNR later used Salvador Allende and the Egyptian Communists and the KGB used Gamal Abdul Nasser and Anwar Sadat. While cultivating Sadat, the KGB groomed Sadat's chief of intelligence, Ali Sabry (KGB codename "Asad", "Lion") to replace him.
When Sukarno fell, the Army, briefed by the CIA, moved on the Indonesian PKI and destroyed it, root and branch, killing over 800,000 cadre. These were events for which Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro (later Sutoro) and her children were present in Jakarta, if I've read the timeline correctly.
Which is where we rejoin our previously scheduled program.
And that is why they hate conservatives. They hate you because you are killers of their dream.
Right on, they're like drug addicts, and they're beginning to sense we are going to take their drugs away.
That makes November 2012 an intervention, doesn't it?