Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cyber Liberty

The new AZ-09 would have given Obama a 51%-47% victory in 2008 and likely would have been a 49%-all tie in the 2004 presidential election, so it is not overwhelmingly liberal by any stretch. Tempe was the heart of the district that elected Schweikert in 2010 and had previously elected J.D. Hayworth several times. Sinema is well to the left of the district’s median, and Vernon Parker has a real opportunity to win in November. A great sign for us was that the GOP primary in AZ-09 had about 20% more voters than the Democrat primary—sure, the Democrats didn’t have a U.S. Senate primary while the GOP did, but it’s not as if the GOP primary was all that contested (Flake won with 69% against divided opposition).


8 posted on 09/04/2012 5:50:03 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: AuH2ORepublican
I agree with your analysis, but this: Tempe was the heart of the district that elected Schweikert in 2010 and had previously elected J.D. Hayworth several times. Liberal Tempe Mayor Harry Mitchell defeated Hayworth. You say the heart of the district was Tempe, I say it was Mesa, and between the two was not a dependable seat (Hayworth defeated an incumbent Dem, IIRC). Now it's Tempe and downtown Phoenix. And a piece of Chandler.

This district was drawn for Democrats.

9 posted on 09/04/2012 6:01:22 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Obama considers the Third World morally superior to the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson