the followers of Catholicism.org attack Brown because he won. They also attacked Brown during his campaign. And never an interest in the facts. They couldn’t tell you who voted yes/no on Kagan, never heard of her.
The A.L.L. crowd in CT attacked pro-life Greenberg during the campaign so they could support the fake pro-lifer Bernier, last-place man. Now they say they are unsure about Roraback. ????? confused people, just a bit ?????
Roraback & Obsitnik CT-4 are deserving of 3rd-party efforts. The foolish cannot distinguish between Roraback and McMahon ... which one do we support? Which one do we oppose?
It y’all cannot distinquish between allies and adversaries, best for them to stay out of politics. The article at Catholicism.org is full of lies, not worthy of the site. (They are Paulistas.)
You post there (at Catholicism.org). I don't.
It is good that Brown voted against Kagan. Did he also vote against Sotomayor? I have no idea. IF he did, he gets double credit. If he put a Senatorial "hold" on either or both candidacies, he gets still more credit. I don't know if he did that. WE need to employ the tactics of the Pat Leahys against THEIR nominees. Brown need not appear in Batman movies like Leahy but he ought to play hardball.
In any event, the night that Brown defeated Coakley, I was in a nursing home recovering from surgery (way out here in Illinois). I did not choose the nursing home. It was luck of the draw. The staff and numerous patients, including me, celebrated the news of his victory. There were high fives. None of saw him as perfect either but he made a positive impression by reminding brain-dead Coakley that they were seeking a Massachusetts Senate seat not Ted Kennedy's Senate seat. That does not mean he gets a lifetime free pass for policy depredations to be committed thereafter. I would certainly vote for him over Cherokee Liz. What on earth does Scott Brown have to do with the absolutely despicable Mittler using corrupt Wall Street $$$$ to BUY the GOP nomination???? I'll answer: Absolutely NOTHING! Brown is a guy of modest means who credibly drives a pickup, poses for cheesecake photos at some point and has generally avoided being a lifetime serial liar like Mittler. 2 out of 3 ain't bad! If he goes to Rolling Thunder next year on his own Harley, so much the better. If he brings Sarah Palin as his passenger, so much the better.
Is this Catholic.org a website of Feeneyites??? That would fit right in with being Paulistinians. Even Ron Paul is not personally responsible for every nut who supported him. As Reagan often said of Birchers and such: They supported me. That does not mean that I support them.
If the "A.L.L. crowd in Connecticut" (Are you referencing the Connecticut Right to Life Corporation on whose board I gladly served and which has always been the PRINCIPLED pro-life group in Connecticut???), "attacked Greenberg" who certainly seems to have been pro-life and supported "fake pro-lifer Bernier," I would need more info. You are there I am not. Billy O'Brien is a great and very principled guy who loses little sleep over often soul-sapping concepts like pragmatism. I have a vague recollection from news coverage that Bernier had previously supported and worked for a bad candidate (not a pro-lifer) but the details are gone. I certainly saw nothing in 2012 suggesting that Greenberg was a bad candidate on pro-life. If anything, he seemed good.
No conservative and no pro-lifer has any business whatsoever being ambivalent about Roraback who has every potential to be the next Weicker (albeit with less arrogance but then Attila the Hun was less arrogant than Lolo) or even the next Nancy Johnson which is nearly as bad. Roraback delenda est. Esty, likewise in spades. Voting in that race is like voting for Mittler or Obozo. Nope!
Who the hell is "Obsitnik?" Let me guess: another Gerry Labriola, Jr., special turd sandwich in the gold coast district??? I must not be foolish. I would use Roraback's remains to grease the treads of our tanks as Patton said of enemies in another context. I think his grand daughter is a nun at questionably Catholic but certainly quite conservative Regina Laudis in Bethlehem, likely in Roraback's district, and I would bet she will emulate Grandpa George when she votes. If Bethlehem is in the 4th, she can switch to opposing the RINO there. Choosing and acting is really not that hard.
I would vote for McMahon with little difficulty. Maybe she can put some serious wrestling moves on Blumenthal and put him out to some pasture where the grass is red.
Am I part of this "y'all" you reference in your last paragraph???? If so, I await your explanation.