Replies

" shall be considered for all purposes certification that the vital event did occur and that the facts of the event are as stated by the applicant." ...

Yes, but, where ?

The applicant could have easily back in 1961 falsify this stated event stated on the application and those at the Hawaii Department of Health could have said:

" ok, we take your word for it, so sign here and pay $ 5.00 and you will get a Hawaii BC in a few weeks by mail. "

Does not make it " LEGAL ".

How about false IDs and false drivers license by Illegals given to them by some states ? does it make it legal ?

How come ?
This so called birth " Event " that was suppose to have happen on Aug,4,1961 in Hawaii conflict with reports that there are records that are in the British National Archives state that he was born in Kenya ?

Could it be possible that ?
Someone ( could have ) fudged the records ?
Made false statements to the Hawaii Department of Health back in 1961 ?
( in which case could have been much easier to lie about back in 1961.)

Even though Onaka can validate that what is on the COLB is the ( " same as " ) what is on those records does not make those " records " valid or legal.

There is a difference between saying that what is on the COLB and what is on those records is " the same as " than ?
Validating that the actual records are legal, or valid.
I think that's the point Butterzillion is trying to make here.

But, what he could not say is ?

Can he validate ?
Certify ?

That he was actually born in Hawaii ?

Where is the certification/validation of the actual birth event ?
Someone's word for it ?

The records have been: amended, a late filing.

Amended ? a late filing ?

Where it gives it a much greater chance that the records could have been changed ? fudged ?
and or ?
False statements could have been given at the time of the application ?