That’s a possible interpretation of events. Yes, there is smoke there. However, my point is you’ll never find the fire this way if Onaka is covering Mr. O’s butt. You can parse words and make inferences from omissions or errors commited by the Hawaiian DOH all day long, but you’ll still never get to see the source documents as long as they are controlled by parties sympathetic to the Administration’s cause.
Tons of smoke surrounds the topic of Mr. Obama’s nativity, but butterdezillion’s analysis depends on the HI DOH executing their functions in a perfect fashion and in 100%, exact compliance with HI statute. I am not willing to give them that much credit. One misstated answer by the DOH could send researchers on a wild goose chase.
Does that make sense? I’m not defending Mr. O, and the Dystel biographies to me are the strongest evidence yet that Mr. O has been lying about his history.
Yes, it’s obvious that Hawaii is covering for “Mr. O’s” butt. They made Bennett jump through a lot of hoops that he shouldn’t haven had to jump through, and he’s a legitimate government official. Butter is right though when she points out that there are statutory requirements for how Hawaii is supposed to handle requests. Their refusals and parsing is very illuminating. There should be no reason for Hawaii to behave as they have. There are statutory ways they could simply provide full disclosure directly to the public and not fool around. Instead of nitpicking at butter or any other skeptics, we should collectively put more pressure on Hawaii to provide full disclosures of the Kenyan Coward™’s records.