Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BurningOak

Luddites don’t understand situations like that. For them, since the process is artificial, the child thus created is “unnatural” and does not deserve to exist. They’d rather curse the child than re-examine their dogma.

You already have someone commenting about how “aged” the newborns look, LOL.


13 posted on 09/03/2012 4:02:44 PM PDT by James C. Bennett (An Australian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: James C. Bennett

I view it same as a child conceived in rape (a more extreme case), the sins of the father are not to be used against the child.


14 posted on 09/03/2012 4:04:48 PM PDT by BurningOak (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2830849/reply?c=1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: James C. Bennett; narses; Salvation; wagglebee

>>Luddites don’t understand situations like that<<

Oh LOL!!! Aren’t you a clever little N00b?

James C. Bennett
Since Jan 4, 2010

Babies are not yarns. And those here who are disgusted by the creation of multiple babies for the one that makes it, are far from Luddites, looking out for their jobs.

We are Pro-Life AS IS Free Republic. Perhaps you should know your audience before you call names.


19 posted on 09/03/2012 4:36:57 PM PDT by netmilsmom (Romney scares me. Obama is the freaking nightmare that is so bad you are afraid to go back to sleep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson