Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie

In all sincerity, I looked up the difference between tactical and strategic.

In what way could Eastwood disable the opposition?

If you didn’t like his time on stage, that’s cool. But given the time constaints and location I don’t see how he could have take on the whole Democratic Party and liberalism and had any lasting effect.


72 posted on 08/31/2012 7:32:18 PM PDT by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: berdie
In what way could Eastwood disable the opposition?

By making it easier for the President to be a target of mockery, the most deadly thing in politics. Think Jimmy Carter's rabbit.

75 posted on 08/31/2012 7:38:14 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The Slave Party Switcheroo: Economic crisis! Zero's eligibility Trumped!! Hillary 2012!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: berdie
If you didn’t like his time on stage, that’s cool. But given the time constaints and location I don’t see how he could have take on the whole Democratic Party and liberalism and had any lasting effect.

It was funny enough, but the wrong target; we should be mocking Zero as emblematic of Democratic socialists as a whole. It would have been easy to bring into Eastwood's piece, pointing to the way worshiping Obama just like they have done with many another Marxist dictator, or the way he has deballed our military just like they did before every other major war, which he could have fit into the bit about Afghanistan easily.

It's not hard to do.

78 posted on 08/31/2012 7:44:36 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The Slave Party Switcheroo: Economic crisis! Zero's eligibility Trumped!! Hillary 2012!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson