Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ModelBreaker

No more foolish than those calling me a nazi for refusing to force a mother to bear the child of her rapist.

Yes, I am choosing the mother’s rights over the baby’s rights.

The mother’s rights were violated first by the rapist. The baby’s rights were created without her consent as a result of the original violation. The baby’s rights do not supercede hers until she consents to bear the child, so get her consent. Convince her to bear it and raise it or adopt it. But if you can’t get her consent, then you are not justified to force her to do as you will.

You cannot control everything everyone does, even if you do not agree with their actions, and even if you feel justified in attempting to control such. You can’t.

Forcing a woman to bear the child of her rapist is abhorrent.


95 posted on 08/31/2012 6:19:28 PM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: chris37
The baby’s rights were created without her consent...The baby’s rights do not supercede hers

Yeah, you gonna have to take that up with God.

101 posted on 08/31/2012 6:27:44 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson