Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah

The one whose mother is a victim of rape and says that she does not consent to bearing the child.

Yes, it is killing. Some killings are justifiable. If she says she isn’t going to do it, then I am not going to force her to.

The person responsible for the killing is the rapist who caused the situation to begin with, and it is a tragedy of immeasurable proportion.

If the rapist wanted his child to have a good start in life, then perhaps he shuldn’t have forced it upon an innocent victim.


92 posted on 08/31/2012 6:10:22 PM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: chris37
Remember, the topic of the 'rape or incest' exception presupposes that Abortion is prohibited.

Quite logically it follows that until the rape and the identity of the rapist is demonstrated in a court of law of appropriate jurisdiction, rape has not been legally demonstrated, ergo, the abortion would be prohibited.

How far are you going to go to kill the kid? Are you going to kill her before the background detective work that uncovers the rapist? Or, wait until after that but maybe before the trial?

Just how much American law are you willing to overturn and abandon just so you can kill that baby that seems to offend you so much?

I find it much simpler to first defend the right to life of the innocent. There are options available that get rid of the kid soon after birth. One option is adoption. Chose Life!

96 posted on 08/31/2012 6:21:29 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson