It isn’t being killed for someone else’s crime, it’s being killed because the mother never consented and still doesn’t consent.
Stop misframing the issue.
If you think the uanalienable right to life is alienable by the choice of men or women, you are by definition pro-choice.
You have abandoned the principles of the Declaration of Independence. You have shredded every clause of the stated purposes of the Constitution. You couldn’t care less about the explicit, imperative requirements of the Constitution that every officer is required to swear a sacred oath to defend.
In essence, your position, and Romney’s position, is identical to Barack Obama’s position.
A position which represents the destruction of the basis for this free republic and our claim to liberty, and destroys the principle of equality before the law.
” it’s being killed because the mother never consented and still doesn’t consent.”
Word games. Mom didn’t consent to the rape. You slide from there to mom having the right to consent to the killing of her baby. Two different consents. The second one involves consenting to the death of an innocent baby. The legal issue, properly framed, is whether mom has the right to consent to the death of her baby because she was raped.