Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Melas

If the woman was aware of her serious health problems, she had the opportunity to PREVENT pregnancy. A child conceived by rape or incest is a victim also. Why is it OK to kill the victim but not have the death penalty for the perpetrator?


36 posted on 08/31/2012 10:52:03 AM PDT by brightright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: brightright

It’s off the subject, but I’ll explain why rape should not be a capital crime.

Do you know why so many of the Little Lindbergh laws were repealed? I do. It’s also the best common sense reason to not make rape a capital crime. When a crime carries the ultimate penalty, there is no longer any reason whatsoever to not escalate that crime to the ultimate crime.

Several states overreacted and knee-jerked statutes into effect post Lindbergh that made kidnapping a capital crime. Kidnapping, already rare, remained at about the same level of occurance, but the number of kidnappings that escalated to murder spiked. The laws were universally repealed, and the kidnappings that escalated to murder declined to their former levels.

You’d see the same thing with rape. Make it a capital crime, and you’ll see more murder rapes. There is no longer a reason to let the victim live, and every reason not to.


43 posted on 08/31/2012 11:16:27 AM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson